Optical Coherence Tomography: A Contemporary Realism in Stent Fracture

Article Information

Nishith Chandra1, Ranjan Modi2*

1Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, New Delhi

2Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Delhi, India

*Corresponding Author: Ranjan Modi, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Delhi, India

Received: 14 January 2021; Accepted: 25 January 2021; Published: 03 February 2021

Citation: Nishith Chandra, Ranjan Modi. Optical Coherence Tomography: A Contemporary Realism in Stent Fracture. Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 5 (2021): 134-142.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook


Stent fracture; Left Anterior Descending; Optical coherence Tomography; Intravascular Imaging

Stent fracture articles; Left Anterior Descending articles; Optical coherence Tomography articles; Intravascular Imaging articles

Article Details

1. Introduction

Stent fracture came into recognition with the advent of the DES [1]. It has been suggested that a greater neointimal proliferation in the BMS reduces the risk of fracture [2, 3] or /and less radio opacity renders the diagnosis of fracture more difficult [1]. Stent Fracture is more frequently observed after DES implantation. The predictors of stent fracture may be attributed to multiple patient, stent and vessel characteristics. The treatment of stent fracture becomes significant in view of Target Lesion Revascularization instent restenosis and stent occlusions leading to repeat revascularization. Thus making stent fracture an important complication in percutaneous coronary intervention.

2. Case Report

A 63 year old male with history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus underwent stenting to Left Anterior Descending (LAD) artery twice 6 years and 1 year back with Sirolimus drug eluting stents (DES). The latter DES stent was placed within the edges of the former DES leading to two layers of DES stents in the mid LAD. He presented to the hospital with anterior wall myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography revealed thrombotic instent total occlusion in LAD (Figure 1). The total occlusion was crossed using a 0.014 wire and check shoot showed instent stenosis of mid LAD (Figure 2). The patient lesion assessment was done using Optical coherence Tomography (OCT). OCT showed complete separation of the DES stents with multiple stent fractures at multiple levels in both the overlapping stents (Figures 3, 4, 5, 6). The lesion was predilated with 2.5 × 12 mm balloon (Figures 7, 8), followed by a DES 4 × 40 mm (Figure 9) which covered the proximal and distal edge of the previous stents. The lesion was post dilated using 4.5 × 12 mm balloon (Figure 10) with a good final result (Figure 11).


Figure 1: Coronary angiography revealed thrombotic instent total occlusion in LAD.


Figure 2: Check shoot showed instent stenosis of mid LAD.


Figure 3: OCT showed complete separation of the DES stents with multiple stent fractures at multiple levels in both the overlapping stents.


Figure 4: OCT showed complete separation of the DES stents with multiple stent fractures at multiple levels in both the overlapping stents.


Figure 5: OCT showed complete separation of the DES stents with multiple stent fractures at multiple levels in both the overlapping stents.


Figure 6: OCT showed complete separation of the DES stents with multiple stent fractures at multiple levels in both the overlapping stents.


Figure 7: Predilatation with balloon.


Figure 8: Predilatation with balloon.


Figure 9: Implantation of DES.


Figure 10: Post dilatation balloon.


Figure 11: Final Result.

3. Discussion

The reported incidence of stent fracture ranges between 0.8 and 19% [4, 5]. Amongst the various types of the DES, the sirolimus Stent (SES) is the main convict [4, 5]. Although there are few investigations reporting equal frequencies of stent fracture in the different types of the DES [6], the majority of the available studies underscore a higher frequency of SF in SES [1, 4, 5]. The interaction between stent and vessel geometry during stent implantation is considered the most important factor in the pathophysiology of SF. Stents change the vessel geometry, thus creating a new vessel angulation. This geometric distortion imposes a considerable mechanical force, increasing metal fatigue and finally the likelihood of stent fracture [1, 7]. Thus, stent flexibility which influences the vessel geometry appears to be directly related to fracture resistance. In DES group, the least flexible device undergoing bench testing for flexibility (Cypher) was the most susceptible to stent fracture [8]. Also, the fact that the SES enjoys relatively high radio opacity is believed to enhance the possibility of fracture diagnosis [5]. There is currently a paucity of data in the existing literature on the rate of stent fracture in the new generation of the DES; nonetheless, the incidence appears to be lower [7, 9].

Apart from stent type some other stent characteristics play role in stent fracture. Longer stents are thought to be more vulnerable to fracture [3, 4]. Radial force is believed to be more pronounced in longer stents, (not) least in the mid-part of the stent, and it increases metal fatigue and consequently the rate of fracture [1, 7]. Overlapping stents by enhancing “axial stiffness” possibly increases the risk of stent fracture [10-12]. A 60% rate of fracture in overlapped stents was observed in one study [5], and elsewhere, higher frequencies of restenosis along with fracture were reported in overlapped stents [13]. Excessive pressure during stent deployment, balloon post- dilation and resultant damage to the stent strut has also been blamed for a rise in the risk of stent fracture [3, 5, 7, 11, 14]. The other procedural predictors are stent and balloon diameter [1, 7, 10, 14], number of the implanted stents [7], residual post-stenting stenosis [7], smaller minimal lumen diameter, and greater acute gain and late loss [7, 15]. Although there have been a few reports showing no specific predilection for the location of stent fracture, the right coronary artery (RCA) appears to be favoured [7, 15, 16].

A few studies showed that the calcification of plaque increases the risk of stent fracture [17]. In addition, ostial [18] and bifurcation lesions [14] are also reported as the predictors of stent fracture.  In respect to patients characteristics Park et al. demonstrated that hypertension and chronic kidney disease were correlated with stent fracture [7].

 In our case the treatment strategy was essential. The dilemma hung between GPIIbIIIa inhibitors, Drug eluting balloon (DEB) and Drug eluting stent (DES). The use of Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) was essential to solve this problem and determine the modality of treatment. The use of DES for re stenting the stent fracture segment was an important decision, the foundation of which laid on the use of OCT, thus improving the mortality, morbidity and prognosis of our patient.

4. Conclusion

Reintervention was associated with a significant reduction of MACE for patients with symptomatic SF induced ISR [19]. The recommendation for reintervention for SF-induced ISR was that new generation DES (cobalt chromium platform) should be selected as the first line option; various studies have [20, 21] reported significant increases in MACE, TLR, ST, and MI after implantation of a Cypher stent for symptomatic SF induced ISR. A few studies have compared the effect of restenting and ballooning with the recurrence of ISR. Given the factor that stent fracture is associated with a higher rate of clinical events and that a stainless stent is 1 of the independent factors of stent fracture, more mechanical durable DES (cobalt chromium platform stent) should replace first generation, stainless platform stents. As stent fracture is more frequently detected in anatomically complex lesions (angulation, tortuosity, hinge motion), better understanding of abnormal distribution of the shear stress [22] before and post-stenting could improvement of stenting techniques and prevent stent fractures. The use of intravascular imaging (OCT) in our case was immensely fruitful as it helped to decide the treatment strategy, reiterating its need in all such cases of complete occlusion with instent restenosis.


  1. Shaikh F, Maddikunta R, Djelmami-Hani M, Solis J, Allaqaband S, Bajwa T. Stent fracture, an incidental finding or a significant marker of clinical in-stent restenosis? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71 (2008): 614-618.
  2. Lee SH, Park JS, Shin DG, Kim YJ, Hong GR, Kim W, et al. Frequency of stent fracture as a cause of coronary restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Am J Cardiol 100 (2007): 627-630.
  3. Doi H, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Tsujita K, Kubo T, Castellanos C, et al. Classification and potential mechanisms of intravascular ultrasound patterns of stent fracture. Am J Cardiol 103 (2009): 818-823.
  4. Ino Y, Toyoda Y, Tanaka A, Ishii S, Kusuyama Y, Kubo T, et al. Predictors and prognosis of stent fracture after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circ J 73 (2009): 2036-2041.
  5. Canan T, Lee MS. Drug-eluting stent fracture: incidence, contributing factors, and clinical implications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75 (2010): 237-245.
  6. Kawai T, Umeda H, Ota M, Hattori K, Ishikawa M, Okumura M, et al. Do drug elution components increase the risk of fracture of sirolimus-eluting stents? Coron Artery Dis 21 (2010): 298-303.
  7. Park KW, Park JJ, Chae IH, Seo JB, Yang HM, Lee HY, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronary drug-eluting stent fracture: insights from a two-center des registry. J Korean Med Sci 26 (2011): 53-58.
  8. Ormiston JA, Webber B, Webster MW. Stent longitudinal integrity bench insights into a clinical problem. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4 (2011): 1310-1317.
  9. Wu MC, Cheng CC, Huang TY. Fracture of zotarolimus-eluting stent after implantation. Tex Heart Inst J 36 (2009): 618-620.
  10. Sianos G, Hofma S, Ligthart JMR, Saia F, Hoye A, Lemos PA, et al. Stent fracture and restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 61 (2004): 111-116.
  11. Adlakha S, Sheikh M, Wu J, Burket MW, Pandya U, William Colyer, et al. Stent fracture in the coronary and peripheral arteries. J Interv Cardiol 23 (2010): 411-419.
  12. Leong DP, Dundon BK, Puri R, Yeend RA. Very late stent fracture associated with a sirolimus-eluting stent. Heart Lung Circ 17 (2008): 426-428.
  13. Lee SE, Jeong MH, Kim IS, Ko JS, Lee MG, Kang WY, et al. Clinical outcomes and optimal treatment for stent fracture after drug-eluting stent implantation. J Cardiol 53 (2009): 422-428.
  14. Hecht HS, Polena S, Jelnin V, Jimenez M, Bhatti T, Parikh M, et al. Stent gap by 64-detector computed tomographic angiography relationship to in-stent restenosis, fracture, and overlap failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 54 (2009): 1949-1959.
  15. Kim HS, Kim YH, Lee SW, Park DW, Lee CW, Hong MK, et al. Incidence and predictors of drugeluting stent fractures in long coronary disease. Int J Cardiol 133 (2009): 354-358.
  16. Park MW, Chang K, Her SH, Lee JM, Choi YS, Kim DB, et al. Incidence and clinical impact of fracture of drug-eluting stents widely used in current clinical practice: Comparison with initial platform of sirolimus-eluting stent. J Cardiol 60 (2012): 215-221.
  17. Halwani DO, Anderson PG, Brott BC, Anayiotos AS, Lemons JE. The role of vascular calcification in inducing fatigue and fracture of coronary stents. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 100 (2012): 292-304.
  18. Bradley JT, Schmoker JD, Dauerman HL. Complete Cypher stent fracture and migration in the ostium of the right coronary artery. J Invasive Cardiol 19 (2007): 99-101.
  19. Park KW, Park JJ, Chae IH, Seo JB, Yang HM, Lee HY, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronary drug-eluting stent fracture: insights from a two-center DES registry. J Korean Med Sci 26 (2011): 53-58.
  20. Ito T, Kimura M, Ehara M, Terashima M, Nasu K, Kinoshita Y, et al. Impact of sirolimus-eluting stent fractures without early cardiac events on long-term clinical outcomes: a multislice computed tomography study. Eur Radiol 24 (2014): 1006-1012.
  21. Ohya M, Kadota K, Tada T, Habara S, Shimada T, Amano H, et al. Stent fracture after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: 8-year clinical outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 8 (2015): e002664.
  22. Molony DS, Timmins LH, Hung OY, Rasoul-Arzrumly E, Samady H, Giddens DP. An assessment of intra-patient variability on observed relationships between wall shear stress and plaque progression in coronary arteries. Biomed Eng Online 14 (2015): 2.

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved