One for All and All in One: Modified Silica Kit-based Protocol for simultaneous sample-specific Extraction of DNA from a Variety of Source Materials

Article Information

Wera M Schmerer*

School of Sciences, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom

*Corresponding Author: Wera M Schmerer, School of Sciences, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom

Received:Accepted: 21 July 2022; Published: 31 August 2022

Citation:

Wera M Schmerer. One for All and All in One: Modified Silica Kit-based Protocol for simultaneous sample-specific Extraction of DNA from a Variety of Source Materials. Journal of Analytical Techniques and Research 4 (2022): 125-129.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook

Abstract

Protocols utilized for the extraction of DNA vary significantly with regards to steps involved and duration of the overall procedure due to materialspecific requirements for ensuring the highest possible yield in recovery of DNA. This variation mostly affects aspects of sample preparation and digestion steps required to release the DNA from the sample material.

In contexts such as the development of new PCR-based assays- which always includes a test of species-specificity- reference samples from a number of species are utilized, requiring extraction of DNA from a variety of source materials, each with their specific conditions for effective isolation of DNA.

The method presented here follows the strategy of synchronizing sample material-specific aspects such as sample preparation and digestion in such a way that one common protocol can be utilized for the actual extraction and purification of the DNA, allowing for an overall more efficient extraction process, while maintaining optimized conditions for DNA recovery.

Keywords

DNA extraction, Method development, Method optimization, Species-Specificity testing, Material-specific extraction, Reference samples, Reference extracts

DNA extraction articles; Method development articles; Method optimization articles; Species-Specificity testing articles, Material-specific extraction articles; Reference samples articles; Reference extracts articles

DNA extraction articles DNA extraction Research articles DNA extraction review articles DNA extraction PubMed articles DNA extraction PubMed Central articles DNA extraction 2023 articles DNA extraction 2024 articles DNA extraction Scopus articles DNA extraction impact factor journals DNA extraction Scopus journals DNA extraction PubMed journals DNA extraction medical journals DNA extraction free journals DNA extraction best journals DNA extraction top journals DNA extraction free medical journals DNA extraction famous journals DNA extraction Google Scholar indexed journals Method development articles Method development Research articles Method development review articles Method development PubMed articles Method development PubMed Central articles Method development 2023 articles Method development 2024 articles Method development Scopus articles Method development impact factor journals Method development Scopus journals Method development PubMed journals Method development medical journals Method development free journals Method development best journals Method development top journals Method development free medical journals Method development famous journals Method development Google Scholar indexed journals Method optimization articles Method optimization Research articles Method optimization review articles Method optimization PubMed articles Method optimization PubMed Central articles Method optimization 2023 articles Method optimization 2024 articles Method optimization Scopus articles Method optimization impact factor journals Method optimization Scopus journals Method optimization PubMed journals Method optimization medical journals Method optimization free journals Method optimization best journals Method optimization top journals Method optimization free medical journals Method optimization famous journals Method optimization Google Scholar indexed journals Species-Specificity testing articles Species-Specificity testing Research articles Species-Specificity testing review articles Species-Specificity testing PubMed articles Species-Specificity testing PubMed Central articles Species-Specificity testing 2023 articles Species-Specificity testing 2024 articles Species-Specificity testing Scopus articles Species-Specificity testing impact factor journals Species-Specificity testing Scopus journals Species-Specificity testing PubMed journals Species-Specificity testing medical journals Species-Specificity testing free journals Species-Specificity testing best journals Species-Specificity testing top journals Species-Specificity testing free medical journals Species-Specificity testing famous journals Species-Specificity testing Google Scholar indexed journals Material-specific extraction articles Material-specific extraction Research articles Material-specific extraction review articles Material-specific extraction PubMed articles Material-specific extraction PubMed Central articles Material-specific extraction 2023 articles Material-specific extraction 2024 articles Material-specific extraction Scopus articles Material-specific extraction impact factor journals Material-specific extraction Scopus journals Material-specific extraction PubMed journals Material-specific extraction medical journals Material-specific extraction free journals Material-specific extraction best journals Material-specific extraction top journals Material-specific extraction free medical journals Material-specific extraction famous journals Material-specific extraction Google Scholar indexed journals Reference samples articles Reference samples Research articles Reference samples review articles Reference samples PubMed articles Reference samples PubMed Central articles Reference samples 2023 articles Reference samples 2024 articles Reference samples Scopus articles Reference samples impact factor journals Reference samples Scopus journals Reference samples PubMed journals Reference samples medical journals Reference samples free journals Reference samples best journals Reference samples top journals Reference samples free medical journals Reference samples famous journals Reference samples Google Scholar indexed journals Reference extracts articles Reference extracts Research articles Reference extracts review articles Reference extracts PubMed articles Reference extracts PubMed Central articles Reference extracts 2023 articles Reference extracts 2024 articles Reference extracts Scopus articles Reference extracts impact factor journals Reference extracts Scopus journals Reference extracts PubMed journals Reference extracts medical journals Reference extracts free journals Reference extracts best journals Reference extracts top journals Reference extracts free medical journals Reference extracts famous journals Reference extracts Google Scholar indexed journals isolation of DNA articles isolation of DNA Research articles isolation of DNA review articles isolation of DNA PubMed articles isolation of DNA PubMed Central articles isolation of DNA 2023 articles isolation of DNA 2024 articles isolation of DNA Scopus articles isolation of DNA impact factor journals isolation of DNA Scopus journals isolation of DNA PubMed journals isolation of DNA medical journals isolation of DNA free journals isolation of DNA best journals isolation of DNA top journals isolation of DNA free medical journals isolation of DNA famous journals isolation of DNA Google Scholar indexed journals Keratinized tissues articles Keratinized tissues Research articles Keratinized tissues review articles Keratinized tissues PubMed articles Keratinized tissues PubMed Central articles Keratinized tissues 2023 articles Keratinized tissues 2024 articles Keratinized tissues Scopus articles Keratinized tissues impact factor journals Keratinized tissues Scopus journals Keratinized tissues PubMed journals Keratinized tissues medical journals Keratinized tissues free journals Keratinized tissues best journals Keratinized tissues top journals Keratinized tissues free medical journals Keratinized tissues famous journals Keratinized tissues Google Scholar indexed journals chitinous insect samples articles chitinous insect samples Research articles chitinous insect samples review articles chitinous insect samples PubMed articles chitinous insect samples PubMed Central articles chitinous insect samples 2023 articles chitinous insect samples 2024 articles chitinous insect samples Scopus articles chitinous insect samples impact factor journals chitinous insect samples Scopus journals chitinous insect samples PubMed journals chitinous insect samples medical journals chitinous insect samples free journals chitinous insect samples best journals chitinous insect samples top journals chitinous insect samples free medical journals chitinous insect samples famous journals chitinous insect samples Google Scholar indexed journals

Article Details

Introduction

In any PCR-based analysis, the use of optimized protocols for the extraction of DNA is an essential factor, ensuring the best possible yield in recovery of the DNA contained in the sample material, to allow for the highest probability of a successful amplification. Resulting extraction protocols vastly differ in the number and extend of steps involved, depending on the physical properties of the sample material, and consequently the difficulty in releasing the DNA containing cells from the surrounding tissue (see e.g. 1).

Main aspects here are sample-specific requirements for pre-preparation steps preceding the actual DNA extraction procedure, and the duration of the digestion step required to release the DNA from the tissue (see e.g. 1). Keratinized tissues such as hair [1,2] and feathers [3,4] require longer incubations for digestion of the sample material, usually performed overnight. Similar in case of extraction from chitinous insect samples, where prolonged digests for several hours to overnight are performed [5], respectively the digest is preceded by extensive homogenization [6]. For easier digestable material such as muscle tissue, shorter incubations of up to 1-2h are required [7,8] while for samples like buccal cells in liquid saliva a very short digest of 15-30min is usually sufficient [9].

In contexts such as the development of new PCR-based assays e.g. 10-12, which always includes a test of species-specificity, reference samples from a number of different species are utilized, requiring extraction of DNA from a variety of source materials.

The method presented here follows the strategy of synchronizing sample material-specific aspects such as sample preparation and digestion in such a way that one common protocol can be utilized for the actual extraction and purification of the DNA, allowing for an overall more efficient extraction process, while maintaining optimized conditions for DNA recovery. The common protocol used here is a modified version of a silica column-based kit protocol [13].

Reagents

  1. Proteinase K (10mg/ml, e.g. BioUltra, Sigma-Aldrich), in PCR grade Water (UltraPure™, Invitrogen)
  2. 1 x PBS (137mM sodium chloride, 2.7mM potassium chloride, and 10mM phosphate buffer): tablet (Phosphate Buffered Saline, biotechnology grade, VWR Life Science) dissolved in PCR grade Water (UltraPure™, Invitrogen), sterile filtered
  3. PCR grade water (UltraPure™, Invitrogen)
  4. Ethanol (abs.)
  5. Z.N.A.® Blood DNA Mini Kit (Omega Bio-Tek)

Equipment

  1. Syringe filter, 0.22μm (e.g. Biofil™, Microlab Scientific)
  2. Syringe, sterile, 10 or 20ml, Luer slip (e.g. BD Medical)
  3. Microscopy scissors, 115mm (Bochem)
  4. Scalpel, size 10, disposable (Swann-Morton)
  5. Forceps, straight, pointed, 130mm (Uspeck)
  6. 2ml reaction tubes (SafeSeal, Sarstedt)
  7. 1000μl pipette tips (Sarstedt)
  8. Parafilm (Bemis Corp.)
  9. precision balance (e.g. VWR)
  10. Thermomixer (Eppendorf) or block heater for 2ml tubes (AccuBlock™ Mini, Labnet)
  11. Tabletop microcentrifuge capable of at least 13,000 x g (e.g. Centrifuge 5425, Eppendorf)

Procedure

General Considerations

Whether pre-preparation steps such as homogenization or pre-digestion of the sample are required depends on the physical properties of the sample material, and consequently the difficulty in releasing the DNA containing cells from the surrounding tissue. Decontamination of sample material, to remove potential non-species DNA, is required where sample material was exposed to the environment prior to collection.

To allow for simultaneous DNA extraction from all source materials, sample-preparation (procedure part I) and pre-digestion (procedure part II) of hair-, feather and insect samples should take place on the day prior to utilization of the silica kit-based protocol (procedure part III).  Pre-digestion of the tissue samples (raw and processed meat) should start 2h prior to the extraction (procedure part III) on the same day. Saliva will not require any pre-digestion, and is thus sub-sampled directly prior to the start of the extraction (procedure part III).

During each part of the procedure, at least one blank control should be included and carried through the remainder of the procedure to establish appropriate contamination controls. With regards to the pre-digestion (procedure part II), separate blank controls for long and short pre-digests should be established.

  1. Sample preparation

Hair

The protocol is suitable for extraction of DNA from hair of a variety of species including human head or body hair. Both, guard hair (top coat) and down hair (undercoat) can be used. In case of coarse hair, 1-3 strands are sufficient. Where hair is very fine or short, up to 5 strands should be used.

  1. Sampling: 1-5 strands of hair
  2. Sample is placed in 2ml reaction tube (SafeSeal, Sarsted)
  3. washed in 1ml PCR-grade water (UltraPure™, Invitrogen)
  4. washed in 500 μl Ethanol (abs.)
  5. air-dried (tube overhead at an angle) until remaining traces of Ethanol are evaporated (min. 30min)

Feathers

The protocol is suitable for extraction of DNA from hair of any bird species. Both vane- and down feathers can be utilized. Depending on the size of the feather, 5-10 barbs (from the vane or after-feather) or down-barbs should be sampled.

  1. Sampling: 5-10 barbs are removed from the rachis (forceps, Uspeck or microscopy scissors, Bochem)
  2. Sample is placed in 2ml reaction tube (SafeSeal, Sarsted)
  3. washed in 1ml PCR-grade water (UltraPure™, Invitrogen)
  4. washed in 500 μl Ethanol (abs.)
  5. air-dried (tube overhead at an angle) until remaining traces of Ethanol are evaporated (min. 30min)

Insects or insect parts

If extraction of DNA specific to the species of the insect specimen is intended, sampling of head, thorax and abdomen should be avoided, to exclude contribution of DNA from food sources. Instead, appendages such as legs and wings should be sampled, depending on anatomy of species analyzed.

  1. Sampling: 1-2 wings, 1-3 legs (depending on size of the insect) are removed (forceps, Uspeck)
  2. Sample is placed in 2ml reaction tube (SafeSeal, Sarsted)
  3. washed in 1ml PCR-grade water (UltraPure™, Invitrogen)
  4. washed in 500 μl Ethanol (abs.)
  5. air-dried (tube overhead at an angle) until remaining traces of Ethanol are evaporated (min. 30min)

Muscle tissue (raw and processed meat)

Both, raw muscle tissue and processed meat can be utilized. Recovery of pristine DNA is expected to be higher in case of raw compared to processed meat, which will have been exposed to DNA-degrading conditions such as heat.

0.1g of tissue is sampled, placed in a 2ml reaction tube (SafeSeal, Sarsted)

Saliva

Neither pre-preparation steps, nor a pre-digestion of the material is required. The modified version of the manufacturer protocol is sufficient for optimal extraction of DNA from this material. 100ul of homogenized (mixed) saliva us pipetted into a 2ml reaction tube (SafeSeal, Sarsted) at the stat of the silica column based extraction (procedure part III).

  1. Pre-digestion

A pre-digestion of sample material with proteinase K is utilized for sample material which requires a more extensive digestion than the one included in the modified silica-kit protocol (procedure part III).

Hair

  1. Decontaminated hair strands are cut into 0.5-1cm sections using decontaminated scissors (microscopy scissors, Bochem), by cutting the sections directly into a 2ml reaction tube (SafeSeal, Sarsted)
  2. Cuttings are mixed with 250ul PBS (1x) and 20ul proteinase K (10mg/ml)
  3. The lid of the 2ml reaction tube should be sealed using a thin strip of Parafilm (Bemis Corp.)
  4. Incubation at 56°C, overnight to 20h

Feathers

  1. Interlocked vane barbs are separated from each other (forceps, Uspeck) to increase the surface exposed to the proteinase K digestion, and placed into a 2ml reaction tube (SafeSeal, Sarsted)
  2. Barbs are mixed with 250ul PBS (1x) and 20ul proteinase K (10mg/ml)
  3. The lid of the 2ml reaction tube should be sealed using a thin strip of Parafilm (Bemis Corp.)
  4. Incubation at 56°C, overnight to 20h

Insects or insect parts

  1. Insect parts are placed into a new 2ml reaction tube (SafeSeal, Sarsted)
  2. mixed with 250ul PBS (1x) and 20ul proteinase K (10mg/ml)
  3. Homogenization of insect parts using a 1000ul pipet tip (Sarstedt) as pestle against the wall of the 2ml reaction tube
  4. The lid of the 2ml reaction tube should be sealed using a thin strip of Parafilm (Bemis Corp.)
  5. Incubation at 56°C, overnight to 20h

Muscle tissue (raw and processed meat)

  1. 1g of tissue in a 2ml reaction tube (SafeSeal, Sarsted) is mixed with 250ul PBS (1x) and 20ul proteinase K (10mg/ml)
  2. Tissue is macerated using a 1000ul pipet tip (Sarstedt) as pestle against the wall of the 2ml reaction tube
  3. The lid of the 2ml reaction tube should be sealed using a thin strip of Parafilm (Bemis Corp.)
  4. Incubation at 56°C for 1-2h

Saliva

No pre-digestion is required!

III. Silica Kit-based DNA Extraction (common protocol):

The protocol here is a modified version of the manufacturer instruction for the E.Z.N.A.® Blood DNA Mini Kit using the "Buccal Swabs Protocol" (Omega Bio-Tek 2019); without addition of PBS to sample material (which is already in liquid form), an extended Proteinase K incubation (30min instead of 10min), elution in 100μl PCR grade water (UltraPure™, Invitrogen) heated to 65°C instead of Elution Buffer, and with re-application of the eluate to the silica column for the second elution step, instead of using a second volume of water.

  1. For the extraction, the complete pre-digest from procedure part II is used. In case of saliva, 100μl of a homogenized sample are placed in a 2ml tube (SafeSeal, Sarsted). An extraction blank is established with 100μl ultrapure water (UltraPure™, Invitrogen).
  2. After addition of 25μl Proteinase K Solution (kit component) and 500μl BL Buffer (kit component), the sample is thoroughly mixed
  3. Incubation at 65°C for 30min.
  4. The proteinase K digest is terminated by addition of 100μl of Ethanol (abs.) and thorough mixing
  5. Sample can be briefly centrifuged to avoid liquid remaining in the lid of the tube
  6. Silica column (kit component: HiBind® DNA Mini Column) is placed in a 2ml collection tube (kit component)
  7. 750μl of the sample is transferred to the column
  8. After centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 1min, the filtrate is discarded
  9. Steps 7 and 8 are repeated until the remainder of the sample has been transferred completely, after which the column is placed into a new collection tube
  10. Following addition of 500μl HBC Buffer (kit component), the column is centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 1min and the filtrate is discarded
  11. After adding 700μl DNA Wash Buffer (kit component), the column is centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 1min and the filtrate is discarded
  12. The wash step is repeated with a second aliquot of 700μl DNA Wash Buffer
  13. To remove any residual ethanol, the column matrix is dried by further centrifugation at maximum speed (at least 10,000 x g) for 2min, after which the column is transferred to a 2ml reaction tube (SafeSeal, Sarsted)
  14. To elute the DNA from the silica matrix, 100μl ultrapure water (UltraPure™, Invitrogen), pre-heated to 65°C, are added to the column, and incubated for 5min at RT, followed by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 1min
  15. The elution step is repeated by re-applying the eluate to the column, followed by incubation and centrifugation as described in step 14, to elute any DNA remaining bound to the silica matrix after the first elution.

Extracts should be stored at 4°C to avoid any degradation of DNA due to freeze-thaw cycles prior to analysis. For long-term storage, 20°C is recommended [14].

Time Taken

To allow for the use of one common protocol for simultaneous extraction of DNA from a variety of source materials, individual stages of the overall procedure are spread over two consecutive days.

Day 1: Hands on manipulation is limited to 15-30min for each hair, feather and insect specimen during sample preparation (procedure part I) and set up of the pre-digestion (procedure part II). This is followed by the pre-digestion step with incubation overnight to 20h.

Day 2: Sample preparation (procedure part I) and set up of the pre-digestion (procedure part II) for muscle tissue (meat) samples, with 15-30min hands on manipulation, followed by the pre-digestion step with incubation for 2h.

Anticipated Results

The method presented here follows the strategy of synchronizing sample material-specific aspects such as sample preparation and digestion in such a way that one common protocol can be utilized for the actual extraction and purification of the DNA, allowing for an overall more efficient extraction process, while maintaining optimized conditions for DNA recovery.

Associated Publications

A pre-print of this article was published via Protocol Exchange, Research Square on January 10, 2022: Schmerer WM. One for All and All in One: Modified Silica Kit-based Protocol for simultaneous sample-specific Extraction of DNA from a Variety of Source Materials. Protocol Exchange, Research Square. pex-1696/v1 (2022)

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.pex-1696/v1

https://protocolexchange.researchsquare.com/article/pex-1696/v1

References

  1. Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R. Chelex® 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques 10 (1991): 506-513.
  2. Brandhagen MD, Loreille O, Irwin JA. Fragmented Nuclear DNA is the Predominant Genetic Material in Human Hair Shafts. Gene 9 (2018): 640.
  3. Morin PA, Messier J, Woodruff DS. DNA extraction, amplification, and direct sequencing from hornbill feathers. J Sci Soc Thailand 20 (1994): 31-41.
  4. Mundy NI, Winchell CS, Woodruff DS. Tandem repeats and heteroplasmy in the mitochondrial DNA control region of the loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus). J Hered 87 (1996): 21-26.
  5. Asghar U, Malik MF, Anwar F, et al. DNA Extraction from Insects by using different Techniques: A Review. Adv Entomol 3 (2015): 132-138.
  6. Cockburn AF, Fritz GA. Isolation and Purification of Insect DNA. Methods Mol Biol 50 (1996): 15-23.
  7. Hunt DJ, Parkes HC, Lumley ID. Identification of the species of origin of raw and cooked meat products using oligonucleotide probes. Food Chem 60 (1997): 437-442.
  8. Yalçinkaya B, Yumbul E, Mozioglu E, et al. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for meat analysis. Food Chem 221: 1253-1257.
  9. Garbieri TF, Brozoski DT, Dionísio TJ, et al. Human DNA extraction from whole saliva that was fresh or stored for 3, 6 or 12 months using five different protocols. J Appl Oral Sci 25 (2017): 147-158.
  10. Halford CM, Jones KJ, Hill DJ, et al. Use of Environmental DNA analysis to detect the presence of water Vole. Inpractice 99 (2018): 35-39.
  11. Franks T, Schmerer WM. Diatoms in Drowning Investigations and Environmental Analysis Species specific Detection of Diatom DNA Traces. Poster presentation. Human IDentification Solutions (HIDS) Conference, Rome, Italy (2018).
  12. Belshaw LJ. The development of an assay for the parallel quantification of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. MSc Thesis, University of Wolverhampton, UK (2021).
  13. Omega Bio-Tek. E.Z.N.A.® Blood DNA Mini Kit. Product Manual (2019).
  14. Herrmann B, Hummel S. Genetic analysis of past populations by aDNA studies. In: IFFH Harkone Symposium Commitee (Eds) Advances in Research on DNA Polymorphisms 12 (1997): 33-47.

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved