Endometriosis-Like Syndrome: From the Concept of Painful Uterine Syndrome to the use of Myometrial Botulinum Toxin Injections under Hysteroscopy

Article Information

Eric Bautrant*, Oona Franké, Christophe Amiel, Thierry Bensousan, Dominique Thiers-Bautrant, C Levêque

Pelvi-Perineal Surgery and Rehabilitation Department, Private Medical Center, L'Avancée-Clinique Axium, 31-33 Avenue du Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, 13090 Aix en Provence, France

*Corresponding Author: Eric Bautrant, Pelvi-Perineal Surgery and Rehabilitation Department, Private Medical Center, L'Avancée-Clinique Axium, 31-33 Avenue du Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, 13090 Aix en Provence, France

Received: 26 October 2020; Accepted: 05 November 2020; Published: 12 November 2020

Citation: Eric Bautrant, Oona Franké, Christophe Amiel, Thierry Bensousan, Dominique Thiers-Bautrant, C. Levêque. Endometriosis-Like Syndrome: From the Concept of Painful Uterine Syndrome to the use of Myometrial Botulinum Toxin Injections under Hysteroscopy. Journal of Surgery and Research 3 (2020): 407-418.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook


Background: A new concept is being advanced to explain undiagnosed chronic pelvic pain, severe dysmenorrhoea, painful uterine contractions, and deep dyspareunia in women, which has been shown to be anatomically negative.

Search strategy: In these "endometriosis-like" syndrome situations, there are many pathophysiological arguments supporting the existence of a visceral uterine sensitization syndrome.

Data collection and analysis: These arguments are further developed and use central sensitization mechanisms, just like those for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or painful bladder syndrome (PBS). The name "painful uterine syndrome" (PUS) has been suggested, and a basis for a PUS diagnostic score has been established. Central sensitization and visceral sensitization mechanisms have been developed. Muscular hypertonia is common in condition of central sensitization and increased uterine contractility has been confirmed using cine magnetic resonance imaging in PUS situations. These findings led to the application of botulinum toxin (BTX) injections under hysteroscopy of the uterine myometrium in PUS.

Main results: A significant amount of physio-pathological evidence supports the existence of visceral uterine sensitization syndrome. We call it Painful Uterine Syndrome (PUS). A pilot study reported the first use of BTX uterine injections under hysteroscopy in PUS and this pilot study, previously presented, has been analysed. It focuses on a simple and reproducible treatment procedure which shows improvement in dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia as well as improved quality of life scores.

Conclusions: PUS should be consider as one main mechanim for Chronic Pelvic Pain. Uterine BTX injection could be a very interesting therapeutic option. Only long-term randomised studies will be able to co


Chronic pelvic pain; Dysmenorrhoea; Dyspareunia; Endometriosis; Adenomyosis; Botulinum toxin injections

Chronic pelvic pain articles, Dysmenorrhoea articles, Dyspareunia articles, Endometriosis articles, Adenomyosis articles, Botulinum toxin injections articles

Chronic pelvic pain articles Chronic pelvic pain Research articles Chronic pelvic pain review articles Chronic pelvic pain PubMed articles Chronic pelvic pain PubMed Central articles Chronic pelvic pain 2023 articles Chronic pelvic pain 2024 articles Chronic pelvic pain Scopus articles Chronic pelvic pain impact factor journals Chronic pelvic pain Scopus journals Chronic pelvic pain PubMed journals Chronic pelvic pain medical journals Chronic pelvic pain free journals Chronic pelvic pain best journals Chronic pelvic pain top journals Chronic pelvic pain free medical journals Chronic pelvic pain famous journals Chronic pelvic pain Google Scholar indexed journals Dysmenorrhoea articles Dysmenorrhoea Research articles Dysmenorrhoea review articles Dysmenorrhoea PubMed articles Dysmenorrhoea PubMed Central articles Dysmenorrhoea 2023 articles Dysmenorrhoea 2024 articles Dysmenorrhoea Scopus articles Dysmenorrhoea impact factor journals Dysmenorrhoea Scopus journals Dysmenorrhoea PubMed journals Dysmenorrhoea medical journals Dysmenorrhoea free journals Dysmenorrhoea best journals Dysmenorrhoea top journals Dysmenorrhoea free medical journals Dysmenorrhoea famous journals Dysmenorrhoea Google Scholar indexed journals Dyspareunia articles Dyspareunia Research articles Dyspareunia review articles Dyspareunia PubMed articles Dyspareunia PubMed Central articles Dyspareunia 2023 articles Dyspareunia 2024 articles Dyspareunia Scopus articles Dyspareunia impact factor journals Dyspareunia Scopus journals Dyspareunia PubMed journals Dyspareunia medical journals Dyspareunia free journals Dyspareunia best journals Dyspareunia top journals Dyspareunia free medical journals Dyspareunia famous journals Dyspareunia Google Scholar indexed journals Endometriosis articles Endometriosis Research articles Endometriosis review articles Endometriosis PubMed articles Endometriosis PubMed Central articles Endometriosis 2023 articles Endometriosis 2024 articles Endometriosis Scopus articles Endometriosis impact factor journals Endometriosis Scopus journals Endometriosis PubMed journals Endometriosis medical journals Endometriosis free journals Endometriosis best journals Endometriosis top journals Endometriosis free medical journals Endometriosis famous journals Endometriosis Google Scholar indexed journals Adenomyosis articles Adenomyosis Research articles Adenomyosis review articles Adenomyosis PubMed articles Adenomyosis PubMed Central articles Adenomyosis 2023 articles Adenomyosis 2024 articles Adenomyosis Scopus articles Adenomyosis impact factor journals Adenomyosis Scopus journals Adenomyosis PubMed journals Adenomyosis medical journals Adenomyosis free journals Adenomyosis best journals Adenomyosis top journals Adenomyosis free medical journals Adenomyosis famous journals Adenomyosis Google Scholar indexed journals Botulinum toxin injections articles Botulinum toxin injections Research articles Botulinum toxin injections review articles Botulinum toxin injections PubMed articles Botulinum toxin injections PubMed Central articles Botulinum toxin injections 2023 articles Botulinum toxin injections 2024 articles Botulinum toxin injections Scopus articles Botulinum toxin injections impact factor journals Botulinum toxin injections Scopus journals Botulinum toxin injections PubMed journals Botulinum toxin injections medical journals Botulinum toxin injections free journals Botulinum toxin injections best journals Botulinum toxin injections top journals Botulinum toxin injections free medical journals Botulinum toxin injections famous journals Botulinum toxin injections Google Scholar indexed journals Painful Uterine Syndrome articles Painful Uterine Syndrome Research articles Painful Uterine Syndrome review articles Painful Uterine Syndrome PubMed articles Painful Uterine Syndrome PubMed Central articles Painful Uterine Syndrome 2023 articles Painful Uterine Syndrome 2024 articles Painful Uterine Syndrome Scopus articles Painful Uterine Syndrome impact factor journals Painful Uterine Syndrome Scopus journals Painful Uterine Syndrome PubMed journals Painful Uterine Syndrome medical journals Painful Uterine Syndrome free journals Painful Uterine Syndrome best journals Painful Uterine Syndrome top journals Painful Uterine Syndrome free medical journals Painful Uterine Syndrome famous journals Painful Uterine Syndrome Google Scholar indexed journals hysteroscopy  articles hysteroscopy  Research articles hysteroscopy  review articles hysteroscopy  PubMed articles hysteroscopy  PubMed Central articles hysteroscopy  2023 articles hysteroscopy  2024 articles hysteroscopy  Scopus articles hysteroscopy  impact factor journals hysteroscopy  Scopus journals hysteroscopy  PubMed journals hysteroscopy  medical journals hysteroscopy  free journals hysteroscopy  best journals hysteroscopy  top journals hysteroscopy  free medical journals hysteroscopy  famous journals hysteroscopy  Google Scholar indexed journals ligament laxity articles ligament laxity Research articles ligament laxity review articles ligament laxity PubMed articles ligament laxity PubMed Central articles ligament laxity 2023 articles ligament laxity 2024 articles ligament laxity Scopus articles ligament laxity impact factor journals ligament laxity Scopus journals ligament laxity PubMed journals ligament laxity medical journals ligament laxity free journals ligament laxity best journals ligament laxity top journals ligament laxity free medical journals ligament laxity famous journals ligament laxity Google Scholar indexed journals cramping and contractions articles cramping and contractions Research articles cramping and contractions review articles cramping and contractions PubMed articles cramping and contractions PubMed Central articles cramping and contractions 2023 articles cramping and contractions 2024 articles cramping and contractions Scopus articles cramping and contractions impact factor journals cramping and contractions Scopus journals cramping and contractions PubMed journals cramping and contractions medical journals cramping and contractions free journals cramping and contractions best journals cramping and contractions top journals cramping and contractions free medical journals cramping and contractions famous journals cramping and contractions Google Scholar indexed journals

Article Details

1. Introduction

For the past century, countless attempts have been made to find physio-pathological explanations for chronic pelvic pain in women as well as for the severe and disabling forms of dysmenorrhoea that can lead to absence from school or even work, often with serious socio-economic consequences [1].

Research on this subject began in the 1950s with Allen and Masters' theory on tears in the large ligament [2]. Then came the role of uterine retroversion in the 1960s [3], the effect of intra-peritoneal adhesions from the 1970s [4], the effect of prostaglandins in the 1980s [5], the possible role of pelvic varicose veins in the 1990s [6], Petros' theory of ligament laxity [7] from the 2000s, and finally, more recently, endometriosis [8] which is now widely mentioned, despite a long period of disinterest. However, although endometriosis is one of the major underlying causes of chronic pelvic pain and severe dysmenorrhoea, it does not explain all of the symptoms.

2. Methods

Observational studies [9] have highlighted many situations in which endometriosis fails to explain certain symptoms:

In most cases, all images and laparoscopies provide normal results in cases of very severe primary dysmenorrhoea in young girls.

  1. Many patients are seen for endometriosis-like symptoms, but all examinations, images, and laparoscopies appear normal.
  2. Other patients who have undergone complete surgical treatment for their endometriosis continue to have the same "endometriosis-like" symptoms.
  3. Some patients who have recovered from their painful symptoms following treatment for endometriosis, return for a suspected endometriosis recession when pelvic pain and dysmenorrhoea recur, but no endometriosis is found.
  4. One report concerns patients complaining of unexplained deep dyspareunia with a painful uterus, even though the examinations, images, and laparoscopies provided normal results.

These different findings suggest that we need to find an alternative explanation, consider a paradigm shift, and may even need to rethink the entire issue.

2.1.The concept of Painful Uterine Syndrome (PUS)

It is based on the principle of central sensitization, described by Woolf in 1983 [10].

Central sensitization is defined as a decrease in cortical nociceptive thresholds [10-13]. This is responsible for a variety of problems such as neuropathic pain, muscle spasms, autonomic nervous system disorders, and visceral sensitization. Abdominal visceral sensitization is known to occur in irritable bowel syndrome [14-17]. The same applies at the pelvic level, where painful bladder syndrome (PBS) also appears to be related to the central sensitization mechanisms [18-21].

The existence of uterine sensitization is, therefore, very likely. This hypothesis has become increasingly evident in recent years, with publications by Iacovides in 2013 [22] and 2015 [23], Giamberardino in 2016 [24], and finally, Jarell in 2016 [25, 26], which confirm a significant reduction in central pain thresholds in dysmenorrheic patients.

The concept of PUS allows us to better understand pelvic pain, whose symptomatic pattern appears to be uterine, with a negative anatomical evaluation, associating primary dysmenorrhoea and painful symptoms related to episodes of violent and inappropriate uterine myometrial contractions. Muscle hypercontractility is a common occurrence in sensitization. Several cine magnetic resonance (cine MRI) studies confirm the significant increase in uterine myometrial peristalsis in dysmenorrheic patients [27-29].

In 2011, we published a diagnostic score for uterine adenomyosis [30], which allowed for a positive diagnosis with a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 90%. This diagnostic score is usefully applied in PUS cases (Table 1) and is defined by a particular type of complaint where the pain, located in the pelvis, is typical for uterine pain, including cramping and contractions, dysmenorrhoea, and deep dyspareunia. A physical examination reveals a painful uterine pain trigger that reproduces the pain.

The concept of PUS not only provides us with a better understanding of the painful symptoms, but it also allows us to better understand how to treat these symptoms and the treatment options available. This validates the suppression of menstrual function as one of the important, primary focus areas in the treatment of dysmenorrhoea, whether or not it is caused by endometriosis [24, 25].

If this fails, there are few conservative treatment options available.

The logical connection with PBS and overactive bladder (OAB), as well as the importance of myometrial hypercontractility mechanisms led us to consider the use of Botulinum Toxin (BTX) injections for treating PUS. BTX injections have been shown to be effective in patients with an overactive bladder, where detrusor hypercontractility is the main symptom [31]. While BTX's effectiveness is somewhat less evident in PBS, it is an attractive treatment option that has been confirmed by recent randomised controlled studies or meta-analysis [32, 33].


Location : Chronic pelvic pain in the lower abdomen (hypogastric)


Type : cramps, uterine contraction sensations, heaviness.

Experiencing menstrual pain outside of the menstrual period


Dysmenorrhoea I or II with or without associated hypermenorrhoea


Deep Dyspareunia


Vaginal examination: painful uterine trigger


Associated co-morbidities: PVD, Pelvic floor muscle myofascial syndrome, PBS, IBS, Pelvic Sensitization criteria



 / 10

Table 1: Criteria for painful uterine syndrome.

Diagnostic score: positive when the score is ³ 5 + imaging and/or laparoscopy eliminating uterine pathology or endometriosis. 98% sensitivity and 90% specificity.

2.2 Uterine myometrium botulinum toxin A (BTX) Injections

The principle is similar to that proposed for BTX injections in the bladder detrusor under cystoscopy for OAB. The BTX units are evenly distributed in the anterior and posterior myometrial wall under hysteroscopic control. In 2018, we conducted an open-label non comparative study on 30 patients with severe dysmenorrhea in therapeutic failure. Patients were failing all the treatments, such as painkillers, anti-inflammatory drugs, the contraceptive pill, and menstrual suppressant therapy. All patients had negative pelvic ultrasound and MRI. A laparoscopy has been performed in all the cases to formally exclude endometriosis.

Uterine myometrial BTX injections are performed under hysteroscopy as an outpatient procedure using a short-term general anaesthetic. The 5 mm Bettocchi type hysteroscope has an operating channel for the needle to pass through. The effective dose used in this study was 200 IU of BTX, Incobotulinum-toxin A. The 200 IU of BTX is diluted in saline and evenly distributed in the uterine myometrium with 10 injections in each anterior and posterior muscle wall under hysteroscopic control (Figure 1). All patients fulfilled the PUS criteria and ranged from 17 to 44 years old. Severe dysmenorrhoea was found in 24 of the patients (89%), all patients had a painful uterine trigger at vaginal examination and 2 patients had deep dyspareunia as the main symptom.


Pregnancy was contraindicated during the 4 months following the injection.

Patients were reviewed at 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months.

They were then assessed on the level of pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Quality of Life Questionnaire, using the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 (MOS SF-36), validated in French. All patients were screened for co-morbidities and central pelvic hypersensitivity criteria using the Convergences PP criteria [34]. In terms of statistical analyses, the pre and post-treatment groups were compared using the Freidman test for multiple, dependant non-parametric data. P-values were two tailed and significance was set at the 5% level.


Figure 1: Technique for hysteroscopic distributing botulinum toxin injections into the uterine myometrium.

A : hysteroscopic view of the injection locations.

B : intra-operative view.

C : sagittal view of the hysteroscope and injection locations.

D : external view of the hysteroscope and the operating channel.

3. Results

The technique and results were presented at the International Neurotoxin Association - INA's 2019 International Toxins Conference [35] and at the "Convergences PP" annual congress in Madrid in November 2019 [36].

No patients were lost during follow-up.

Very few side effects were reported: 2 patients (6.7%) experienced a severe worsening of their pain in the immediate post-operative period. Both patients were then significantly improved by their first follow-up visit at 8 weeks.

 VAS scores were significantly improved (Table 2) for dysmenorrhoea (80 vs 25: p=0.001), dyspareunia (71 vs 28: p=0.02), and pelvic pain outside of menstruation (67 vs 28: p=0.03). Quality of life scores all improved dramatically. The sexual activity questionnaire scores also improved, with a significantly reduced level of discomfort (4.8 vs. 2.2: p=0.02) and improvement in habit (0,2 vs 1,9: p=0,03). 9 patients (30%) had positive criteria for pelvic hypersensitivity. In this group, the improvement was not significant for all scores.

In this study's follow-up, 39% of patients were given new injections before the reappearance of PUS.


Before injection

8 to 12 weeks after injection


VAS dysmenorrhea



0, 01

VAS dyspareunia



0, 02

VAS non menstrual pelvic pain



0, 03

Sexual activity questionnaire (discomfort)

4, 8

2, 2

0, 02

Sexual activity questionnaire (improvement in habit)

0, 2

1, 9

0, 03

Patient with pelvic central sensitilization criteria (VAS and scores)




Table 2 : Changes in pain symptoms and quality of quality of life 8 to 12 weeks after uterine myometrial botulinum toxin injections [34].

4. Discussion

The principle of central sensitization, as described by Woolf in 1983, is a manifestation of the somatosensory plasticity of the central nervous system [10, 37]. Central nociceptive sensitization develops as a result of sustained nociceptor activity in physiological conditions but also in pathological situations following inflammatory attacks, nerve damage, or trauma [38].

The mechanisms involved in the development of central nociceptive sensitization are quite complicated. They involve disrupting inter and intracellular neuronal signalling using numerous membrane receptors and various intracellular transduction pathways, resulting in changes in genetic expressions. Changing cell phenotypes is one aspect of maintaining central nociceptive sensitization [38, 39, 40]. A growing number of studies indicate that epigenetic changes may be involved in pathophysiology [41].

Woolf summarises central sensitization as the lowering of cortical nociceptive thresholds [10-13]. These lower pain thresholds will have multiple clinical consequences and lead to so-called co-morbidities [11, 24]. Therefore, myofascial pain, autonomic disorders with hyperalgesia, urinary, rectal and sexual dysfunction, neuropathic pain, and visceral pain are more or less associated [42].

4.1 Main findings

The existence of PUS by central sensitization, as defined above, which in particular causes severe dysmenorrhoea, appears increasingly plausible, regardless of whether endometriosis is present or not. Recent studies by Evans [43], Stratton [44], and Grundström [45] all point in this direction.

PUS or "endometriosis-like" syndrome is typically identified by negative imaging and anatomical findings. The main symptom is severe dysmenorrhoea; however, pelvic pain from uterine contractions, deep dyspareunia, and uterus trigger pain at vaginal examination, are among the diagnostic criteria as defined in the PUS diagnostic score (Table 1).

The Viscero-Visceral sensitization mechanisms, as described by Giamberardino [46], account for a common association with painful bladder syndrome through peripheral sensitization phenomena. Similarly, co-morbidities such as hyperesthesia of the vulvar vestibule, are connected with the occurrence of the frequent Provoked Vulvar Vestibulodynia (PVD) [47], which is responsible for introductory dyspareunia.

But the most frequently associated disorders are pelvic floor muscle hypertonia and myofascial syndromes [42, 44]. This muscle hypertonia is consistent with pelvic sensitization and, therefore, applies to PUS, which has been well documented in the various cine MRI studies, as described above. In terms of therapeutic consequences, BTX injections have a logical application here. Besides its widely demonstrated effectiveness in treating muscle spasms, hypertonia, or hyperactivity by inhibiting the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction by competitive neurotoxin inhibition [48, 49], BTX may also have direct peripheral and central analgesic effects. It may also have a direct effect on inflammation by reducing the release of pro-inflammatory neuropeptides [50, 51].

The use of BTX in pelvic floor muscle hypertonia, spasms, and myofascial pain was first documented by Abbott in 2006 [52]. Several publications have confirmed that botulinum toxin injections are useful for treating this condition [53-55, 57, 58]. The effectiveness of BTX injections on pelvic floor muscle hypertonia and spasms has been proven in a number of prospective and randomised studies [54, 57]. On the other hand, for myofascial pain, the randomised studies conducted by Dessie [59] and Levesque [60] found no significant difference with the control group for saline and local anaesthetics, respectively.

As far as we know, uterine myometrial BTX injections used in cases of PUS and/or severe dysmenorrhoea has never been described before. This indication follows the same pathophysiological approach as that proposed for OAB or PBS [31-33]. The procedure under hysteroscopy is simple and can be easily reproduced. Our pilot study [34], mentioned above, reported no immediate or remote post-operative complications.

Although pregnancy was not recommended within 4 months of the myometrial injection in this study, no maternal or fetal complications were reported in the literature when a botulinum toxin injection was administered during pregnancy [61, 62]. One patient in our study became pregnant, despite being advised against it. This was an unintended pregnancy and a voluntary termination was performed in the first trimester. This procedure was carried out without any complications.

4.2 Strengths and limitation 

Our study demonstrated significant improvements in PUS, dysmenorrhoea, and deep dyspareunia in patients without co-morbidities or Convergences PP pelvic sensitization criteria (36). The best results were obtained when the uterine pain symptoms were isolated, with no associated pelvic floor myofascial syndrome or co-morbidities (PBS or PVD). In our group of patients with pelvic sensitization criteria, there was no significant improvement in the quality of life scores, but the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) [63] improved for more than half of the patients in this group.

The results of this pilot feasibility study suggest an interesting perspective for the treatment of severe dysmenorrhoea and PUS, in the absence of alternative treatment, and in cases where well-conducted medical treatments have failed. A prospective, randomised, double-blind, multicentric study (Uteroxine) is currently underway which compares the hysteroscopic myometrial injection (200 IU of botulinum toxin A) to the 2mg/ml Ropivacaine injection. The results of the Uteroxine randomised comparative study should allow us to confirm the benefits of botulinum toxin injections as a treatment for this condition.

5. Conclusion

A significant amount of physio-pathological evidence supports the existence of visceral uterine sensitization syndrome.

 We call it Painful Uterine Syndrome (PUS). It can be used to explain a series of pelvic pain symptoms that were previously difficult to explain in women, including severe dysmenorrhoea with a negative anatomical assessment. Diagnostic criteria specific to PUS, which are proposed here with satisfactory sensitivity, could be made available in order to facilitate diagnosis. PUS may be associated with PBS and irritable bowel syndrome through peripheral viscero-visceral sensitivity mechanisms. However, the phenomenon most frequently associated with visceral sensitization is muscular hypercontractility. This is demonstrated in the uterine myometrium, opening the way for treatment with BTX injections.

A pilot study reporting the first use of BTX injections under hysteroscopy in PUS indicated an improvement in dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia as well as improved quality of life scores. The prospective and randomised Uteroxine study is currently underway to confirm the necessary initial results.


  1. Ju H, Jones M, Mishra G. The prevalence and Risk Factors of Dysmenorrhea. Epidemiol Rev 36 (2014): 104-113.
  2. Allen WM, Masters WH. Traumatic laceration of uterine support. Am J Obstet Gynecol 70 (1955): 500-513.
  3. Cagnacci A, Grandi G, Cannoletta, Xholli A, Piacenti I, et al. Intensity of menstrual pain and estimated angle of uterine flexion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93 (2014): 58-63.
  4. Hammoud A, Gago LA, Diamond MP. Adhesions in patients with Chronic Pelvic pain : a role for adhesiolysis? Fertil Steril 82 (2004): 1483-1491.
  5. Chan WY. Prostaglandins and nonsteroidals antiinflammatory drugs in dysmenorrhera. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 23 (1983): 131-149.
  6. Borghi C, Dell’Atti L. Pelvic congestion syndrome : the current state of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293 (2016): 291-301.
  7. Petros PE, Richardson PA. TFS posterior sling improves overactive bladder, pelvic pain and abnormal emptying, even with minor prolapse-a prospective urodynamic study. Pelviperineology 29 (2010): 52-55.
  8. Stratton P, Berkley KJ. Chronic Pelvic Pain and endometriosis: translational evidence of the relationship and implications. Human Reprod Update 17 (2011): 327-346.
  9. Lopez A. Pain and Endometriosis. Convergences PP annual congress; Madrid 2019 November 14-16th.
  10. Woolf CJ. Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature 3065944 (1983): 686-688.
  11. Woolf CJ. Central Sensitization : uncovering the relation between pain and plasticity. Anesthesiology 106 (2007): 864-867.
  12. Woolf CJ. Central Sensitization : Implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain 152 (2011): S2-S15.
  13. Woolf CJ. What to call amplification of nociceptive signals in the central nervous system that contribute to wispread pain. Pain 155 (2014): 1911-1912.
  14. Bonaz B. Visceral sensitivity perturbation integration in the brain-gut axis in functional digestive disorders. J Physiol Pharmacol 54 (2003): 27-42.
  15. Kanazawa M, Hongo M, Fukudo S. Visceral hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26 (2011): 119-121.
  16. Eisenbruch S. Abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome : a review of putative psychological, neural and neuro-immune mechanisms. Brain Behav Immun 25 (2011): 386-394.
  17. Keszthelyi D, Troost FJ, Simrén M, Ludidi S, Kruimel JW, et al. Revisiting concepts of visceral nociception in irritable bowel syndrome. Eur J Pain 16 (2012): 1444-1454.
  18. Fitzgerald MP, Koch D, Senka J. Visceral and cutaneous sensory testing in patients with painful bladder syndrome. Neurourol Urodyn 24 (2005): 627-632.
  19. Lai HH, Gardner V, Ness TJ, Gereau RW. Segmental hyperalgesia to mechanical stimulus in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome : evidence of central sensitization. J Urol 191 (2014): 1294-1299.
  20. Grundy L, Caldwell A, Brierley SM. Mechanisms underlying overactive bladder and interstitial Cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. Front Neurosci 12 (2018): 931.
  21. Akiyama Y, Luo Y, Hanno PM, Maeda D, Homma Y. Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome : The evolving landscape, animal models and future perspectives. Int J Urol 4 (2020): 10.
  22. Iacovides S, Baker FC, Bentley A. Women with dysmenorrhea are hypersensitive to experimental deep muscle pain across the menstrual cycle. J Pain 14 (2013): 1066-1076.
  23. Iacovides S, Avidon I, Baker FC. What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today : a critical review. Hum Reprod Update 21 (2015): 762-778.
  24. Giamberardino MA, Tana C, Costantini R. Pain theresholds in women with chronic pelvic pain. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 26 (2014): 253-259.
  25. Jarrell J, Arendt-Nielsen J. Allodynia and dysmenorrhea. J Obstet Gynecol Can 38 (2016): 270-274.
  26. Jarrell J, Arendt-Nielsen J. Evolutionary considerations in the development of chronic pelvic pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215 (2016): 201.
  27. Katoaka M, Togashi K, Kido A, Fujiwara T, Koyama T, et al. Dysmenorrhea : evaluation with cine-mode-display MR imaging initial experience. Radiology 235 (2005): 124-131.
  28. Guo SW, Mao X, Ma Q, Liu X. Dysmenorrhea and its severity are associated with increased uterine contractility and overexpression of oxytocin receptor (OTR) in women symptomatic adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 99 (2013): 231-240.
  29. Liu S, Zhang Q, Yin C, Chan Q, Chen W, et al. Optimized approach to cine MRI of uterine peristalsis. J Magn Reson Imaging 44 (2016): 1397-1404.
  30. Bautrant E, Bryselbout MA, Thiers-Bautrant D, Eggermont E, Boyer R, et al. Chronic pelvic pain syndrome due to uterine adenomyosis : diagnostic criteria and conservative treatment. Pelvi Perineol 6 (2011): 42-45.
  31. Reynolds WS, Dmochowski R, Wein A, Bruehl S. Does central sensitization help explain idiopathic overactive bladder ? Nat Rev Urol 13 (2016): 481-491.
  32. Kuo HC, Jiang YH, Tsai YC, Kuo YC. Intravesical botulinum toxin-A injections reduce bladder pain of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome refractory to conventional treatment - A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Neurourol Urodyn 35 (2016): 609-614.
  33. Giannantoni A, Gubbiotti M, Bini V. Botulinum Neurotoxin A intravesical injections in interstitial cystitis/bladder painful syndrome : A systematic review with meta-analysis. Toxins (Basel) 11 (2019): 510.
  34. Levesque A et al, Convergences PP Network. Cinical criteria of central sensitization in chronic pelvic and perineal pain (Convergences PP criteria): elaboration of a clinical evaluation tool based on formal expert consensus. Pain Med 19 (2018): 2009-2015.
  35. Bautrant E, Levêque C, Boyer R, Collet S, Bartoli D, et al. Pilot study of Botulinum Toxin A uterine muscle injection in the the treatment of acute dysmenorrhea, uterine pain and deep dyspareunia. Toxicon (2018): S2-S120: S7-S8.
  36. Bautrant E. Endometriosis like syndrome : from the concept of uterine pain syndrome to the use of Botulinic Toxin injections. Convergences PP annual congress ; Madrid (2019).
  37. Latremoliere A, Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity. J Pain (2009): 895-926.
  38. Pohl M Central nociceptive sensitization : cellular and molecular signalization systems. Douleurs Evaluation-Diagnostic-Traitement 15 (2014): 44-51.
  39. Sengupta JN. Visceral pain : the neurophysiological mechanism. Handb Exp Pharmacol 194 (2009): 32-74.
  40. Janig W. Neurobiology of visceral pain. Schmerz 28 (2014): 233-251.
  41. Zang Z, Cai YQ, Zou F, Bie B, Pan ZZ. Epigenetic suppression of GAD65 expression mediates persistant pain. Nat Med 17 (2011): 1448-1455.
  42. Affaitati G, Costantini R, Tana C, Cipollone F, Giamberardino MA. Co-occurrence of pain syndromes. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 127 (2020): 625-646.
  43. Evans SF, Brooks TA, Esterman AJ, Hull ML, Rolan PE. The comorbidities of dysmenorrhea : a clinical survey comparing symptom profile in woman with and without endometriosis. J Pain Res 11 (2018): 3181-3194.
  44. Stratton P, Khachikyan I, Sinaii N, Ortiz R, Shah j. Association of chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis with signs of sensitization and myofascial pain. Obstet Gynecol 125 (2015): 719-728.
  45. Grundström H, Gerdle B, Alehagen S, Berterö C, Arendt-Nielsen L, et al. Reduced pain thersholds and signs of sensitization in women with persistent pelvic pain and suspected endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 98 (2019): 327-336.
  46. Giamberardino MA, Costantini R, Affaitati G, Fabrizio A, Tafuri E, et al. Viscero-visceral hyperalgesia: characterization in different clinical models. Pain 151 (2010): 307-322.
  47. Bautrant E, O Porta, F Murina, H Mühlrad, C Levêque, et al. Provoked vulvar vestibulodynia : Epidemiology in Europe, physio-pathology, consensus for first line treatment and evaluation of second-line treatments. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 48 (2019): 685-688.
  48. Poulain B. Botulinum neurotoxin. Rev Neurol(Paris) 166 (2010): 7-20.
  49. Montal M. Botulinum neurotoxin : a marvel of protein design. Annu Rev Biochem 79 (2010): 591-617.
  50. Pellett S, Yaksh TL, Ramachandran R. Current status and future directions of botulinum neurotoxins for targeting pain processing. Toxins (Basel) 7 (2015): 4519-4563.
  51. Aredo JV, Heyrana KJ, Karp BI, Shah JP, Stratton P. Relating chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis to signs of sensitization and myofascial pain and dysfunction. Semin Reprod Med 35 (2017): 88-97.
  52. Abbott JA, Jarvis SK, Lyons SD, Thomson A, Vancaille TH. Botulinum toxin type A for chronic pain and pelvic floor spasm in women : a andomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 108 (2006): 915-923.
  53. Bautrant E, Quintas-Marquès L, Eggermont J, Faller E, Weber P, et al. Use of botulinum toxin neurotoxin type A injections to the perineal muscles in cases of perineal pain and dysfunction associated with pelvic floor muscle overcontraction and myalgia. Toxicon 11 (2014): 021.
  54. Morrissey D, El-Khawand D, Ginzburg N, Wehbe S, O’Hare P3rd, et al. Botulinum toxin A injections into pelvic floor muscles under electromyographic guidance for women with refractory high-tone pelvic floor dysfunction : A 6-month prospective pilot study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 21 (2015): 277-282.
  55. Karp BI, Tandon H, Vigil D, Stratton P. Methodological approaches to botulinum toxin for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain, vaginismus, and vulvar pain disorders. Int Urogynecol J 30 (2019): 1071-1081.
  56. Tandon HK, Stratton P, Sinaii N, Shah J, Karp BI. Botulinum toxin for chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis : a cohort study of a pain-focused treatment. Reg Anesth Pain Med (2019).
  57. Abbott J. Gynecological indications for the use of botulinum toxin in women with chronic pelvic pain. Toxicon 54 (2009): 647-653.
  58. Bhide AA, Puccini F, Khullar V, Elneil S, Digesu GA. Botulinum neurotoxin type A injection of the pelvic floor muscle in pain due to spasticity : a review of the current literature. Int Urogynecol J 24 (2013): 1429-1434.
  59. Dessie SG, Von Bargen E, Hacker MR, Haviland MJ, Elkadry E. A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of onabotulinumtoxin A trigger point injections for myofascial pelvic pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 221 (2019): 517.
  60. Levesque A, Ploteau S, Michel F, Siproudhis L, Bautrant E, et al. Botulinum toxin infiltrations versus local anaesthetic infiltrations in pelvic floor myofascial pain: Multicentre, randomized, double blind study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med (2020).
  61. Brin MF, Kirby RS, Slavotinek A, Miller-Messana MA, Parker L, et al. Pregnancy outcomes following exposure to onabotulinumtoxinA. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 25 (2016):179-187.
  62. Li W, Tang M. Application of botulinum toxin in pregnancy and its impact in female reproductive health. Expert Opin Drug Saf 19 (2020): 83-91.
  63. Neblett R, Hartzell MM, Cohen H, Mayer TG, Williams M, et al. Ability of the Central Sensitization Inventory to Identify Central Sensitivity Syndromes in an Outpatient Chronic Pain Sample. Clin J Pain 31 (2014): 323-332.

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved