CLEC12A: A Promise Target for Cancer Therapy

Article Information

Ranodeep Chatterjee1 and Urmi Chatterji1*

1Cancer Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Calcutta 35 Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata – 700019, India.

*Corresponding Author: Urmi Chatterji, Cancer Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Calcutta 35 Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata – 700019, India.

Received: 30 August 2022; Accepted: 21 September 2022; Published: 31 October 2022

Citation: Ranodeep Chatterjee and Urmi Chatterji. CLEC12A: A Promise Target for Cancer Therapy. Archives of Clinical and Medical Case Reports 6 (2022): 706-714.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook


C-Type Lectin Receptors (CLRs); C-Type Lectin Receptor Family 12 Member A (CLEC12A); Cancer Therapy; Pathogen Recognition Receptors (PRRs); Toll-like Receptors (TLRs)

C-Type Lectin Receptors (CLRs) articles; C-Type Lectin Receptor Family 12 Member A (CLEC12A) articles; Cancer Therapy articles; Pathogen Recognition Receptors (PRRs) articles; Toll-like Receptors (TLRs) articles

C-Type Lectin Receptors articles C-Type Lectin Receptors Research articles C-Type Lectin Receptors review articles C-Type Lectin Receptors PubMed articles C-Type Lectin Receptors PubMed Central articles C-Type Lectin Receptors 2023 articles C-Type Lectin Receptors 2024 articles C-Type Lectin Receptors Scopus articles C-Type Lectin Receptors impact factor journals C-Type Lectin Receptors Scopus journals C-Type Lectin Receptors PubMed journals C-Type Lectin Receptors medical journals C-Type Lectin Receptors free journals C-Type Lectin Receptors best journals C-Type Lectin Receptors top journals C-Type Lectin Receptors free medical journals C-Type Lectin Receptors famous journals C-Type Lectin Receptors Google Scholar indexed journals COVID-19 articles COVID-19 Research articles COVID-19 review articles COVID-19 PubMed articles COVID-19 PubMed Central articles COVID-19 2023 articles COVID-19 2024 articles COVID-19 Scopus articles COVID-19 impact factor journals COVID-19 Scopus journals COVID-19 PubMed journals COVID-19 medical journals COVID-19 free journals COVID-19 best journals COVID-19 top journals COVID-19 free medical journals COVID-19 famous journals COVID-19 Google Scholar indexed journals CLEC12A articles CLEC12A Research articles CLEC12A review articles CLEC12A PubMed articles CLEC12A PubMed Central articles CLEC12A 2023 articles CLEC12A 2024 articles CLEC12A Scopus articles CLEC12A impact factor journals CLEC12A Scopus journals CLEC12A PubMed journals CLEC12A medical journals CLEC12A free journals CLEC12A best journals CLEC12A top journals CLEC12A free medical journals CLEC12A famous journals CLEC12A Google Scholar indexed journals Ultrasound articles Ultrasound Research articles Ultrasound review articles Ultrasound PubMed articles Ultrasound PubMed Central articles Ultrasound 2023 articles Ultrasound 2024 articles Ultrasound Scopus articles Ultrasound impact factor journals Ultrasound Scopus journals Ultrasound PubMed journals Ultrasound medical journals Ultrasound free journals Ultrasound best journals Ultrasound top journals Ultrasound free medical journals Ultrasound famous journals Ultrasound Google Scholar indexed journals Cancer Therapy articles Cancer Therapy Research articles Cancer Therapy review articles Cancer Therapy PubMed articles Cancer Therapy PubMed Central articles Cancer Therapy 2023 articles Cancer Therapy 2024 articles Cancer Therapy Scopus articles Cancer Therapy impact factor journals Cancer Therapy Scopus journals Cancer Therapy PubMed journals Cancer Therapy medical journals Cancer Therapy free journals Cancer Therapy best journals Cancer Therapy top journals Cancer Therapy free medical journals Cancer Therapy famous journals Cancer Therapy Google Scholar indexed journals Radiotherapy articles Radiotherapy Research articles Radiotherapy review articles Radiotherapy PubMed articles Radiotherapy PubMed Central articles Radiotherapy 2023 articles Radiotherapy 2024 articles Radiotherapy Scopus articles Radiotherapy impact factor journals Radiotherapy Scopus journals Radiotherapy PubMed journals Radiotherapy medical journals Radiotherapy free journals Radiotherapy best journals Radiotherapy top journals Radiotherapy free medical journals Radiotherapy famous journals Radiotherapy Google Scholar indexed journals CT articles CT Research articles CT review articles CT PubMed articles CT PubMed Central articles CT 2023 articles CT 2024 articles CT Scopus articles CT impact factor journals CT Scopus journals CT PubMed journals CT medical journals CT free journals CT best journals CT top journals CT free medical journals CT famous journals CT Google Scholar indexed journals Prognosis articles Prognosis Research articles Prognosis review articles Prognosis PubMed articles Prognosis PubMed Central articles Prognosis 2023 articles Prognosis 2024 articles Prognosis Scopus articles Prognosis impact factor journals Prognosis Scopus journals Prognosis PubMed journals Prognosis medical journals Prognosis free journals Prognosis best journals Prognosis top journals Prognosis free medical journals Prognosis famous journals Prognosis Google Scholar indexed journals Pathogen Recognition Receptors articles Pathogen Recognition Receptors Research articles Pathogen Recognition Receptors review articles Pathogen Recognition Receptors PubMed articles Pathogen Recognition Receptors PubMed Central articles Pathogen Recognition Receptors 2023 articles Pathogen Recognition Receptors 2024 articles Pathogen Recognition Receptors Scopus articles Pathogen Recognition Receptors impact factor journals Pathogen Recognition Receptors Scopus journals Pathogen Recognition Receptors PubMed journals Pathogen Recognition Receptors medical journals Pathogen Recognition Receptors free journals Pathogen Recognition Receptors best journals Pathogen Recognition Receptors top journals Pathogen Recognition Receptors free medical journals Pathogen Recognition Receptors famous journals Pathogen Recognition Receptors Google Scholar indexed journals Toll-like Receptors articles Toll-like Receptors Research articles Toll-like Receptors review articles Toll-like Receptors PubMed articles Toll-like Receptors PubMed Central articles Toll-like Receptors 2023 articles Toll-like Receptors 2024 articles Toll-like Receptors Scopus articles Toll-like Receptors impact factor journals Toll-like Receptors Scopus journals Toll-like Receptors PubMed journals Toll-like Receptors medical journals Toll-like Receptors free journals Toll-like Receptors best journals Toll-like Receptors top journals Toll-like Receptors free medical journals Toll-like Receptors famous journals Toll-like Receptors Google Scholar indexed journals

Article Details

1. Introduction

Cancer is the leading cause of mortality in every country in the world [1]. The World Health Organization reported that cancer is one of the major causes of disease-related deaths before the age of 70 [2]. Globally, cancer incidences and mortality is alarming and can often be co-related with the socio-economic development of a given population. This concern was depicted in 4-tier Human Development Index (HDI) of the United Nation [3]. An estimated 19.3 million fresh cases and 10 million deaths were registered globally in 2020. Of these, most new cases are of female breast cancer and maximum mortality rate is of lung cancer among both sexes. The cases of blood cancer are also distressing with 711,795 deaths among 1,278,362 new cases registered in 2020 [4]. Worldwide cancer statistics show disconcerting rates of occurrences and deaths even after recent advances in healthcare. Treatment of cancer continues to beat challenge since it is often difficult to appropriately categorise them, based on their underlying molecular signatures. Therefore, elucidating key signaling markers and their role in different types of cancers is a pre-requisite. Research on the haematological niche has progressed in the recent years [5]. The complexity of the human bone marrow, with context to haematological malignancies, is more difficult to elucidate with the present strategies compared to the niche of solid tumors. There can, however, be few similarities between the two, as the bone marrow is a common site of metastasis of solid tumors too [6]. Relevant information has now been established on solid tumors and their micro-environments, which include immune, endothelial and mesenchymal cells. Albeit a gap in knowledge still exists, the need to discover definite means to interfere with the complex interplay between the niches is imperative to define efficient chemotherapeutic strategies in future.

2. Role of PRRs in the Immune System

In accordance, attempts have been made to establish a link between the immune system and the tumor microenvironment, to comprehend tumor progression and achieve effective therapeutic approaches. The innate and adaptive immunities work in co-ordination as the defence mechanisms of the immune system. Their primary role is to protect from harmful pathogens and maintain a symbiotic relationship with beneficial organisms colonizing within our system [7]. In innate immunity, immune cells are activated by their pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which bind to pattern molecules of invading pathogens. The most common and widely studied PRRs are toll-like receptors (TLRs) and C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) [8]. Their response involves antigen capture, enhancing their MHC-II presentation receptors and production of chemokines and/or cytokines at the site of inflammation [9]. The TLRs and CLRs of the immune cells work in coordination with the immune system. The TLR expression has been identified in different subsets of dendritic cells (DCs), T-cells, basophils, mast cells, macrophages, eosinophils,  neutrophils and monocytes [10]. The N-terminal domain of TLRs is associated with ligand binding. The ligands include molecular patterns like lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which are the constituents of the outer membrane of gram negative bacteria. The most widely studied TLR associated with LPS ligand binding, interaction and downstream activation, is TLR-4. On the other hand, the C-terminal which is the cytoplasmic domain of TLRs has a homology with interleukin type-1 receptor (IL-1R), known as Toll 1L-1R receptor (TIR) domain [11]. This domain interacts with adaptor molecules and activates a cascade which regulates the inflammatory status in cells [12]. The main two adaptor molecules which are recruited to the TIR domain are myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (Myd88) and TIR domain-containing adaptor-inducing interferon (IFN)-β [TRIF or Toll-like receptor adaptor molecule 1 (TICAM-1)]. The adaptors channelize a signaling cascade that can eventually activate the NF-kB family of transcription factors, resulting in increased transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines and augmentation of inflammatory response by the immune system [13]. CLRs are expressed in endothelial cells, DCs, monocytes, macrophages and Langerhans cells. The family of PRRs are slightly more complex compared to the TLRs. The major attribute for CLRs is that they have a carbohydrate-recognition domain (CRD) which can sense and bind to carbohydrate molecular patterns with Ca2+ ions, even though some CLRs can bind to carbohydrate independent of Ca2+ [14]. The cytosolic tails of CLRs can have either immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) domains or immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif (ITIM) domains or do not clearly express any of these domains [15]. The ones with an activating moiety recruit spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk), while others recruit Syk by ITAM-associated adaptor molecules, e.g., Fc receptor γ-chain (FcRγ) or death associated protein 1 (DAP1) to induce pro-inflammatory responses like synthesis of key mediators, activation of inflammasomes and production of chemokines/cytokines [16]. On the other hand, CLRs with an ITIM motif interact with their Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase (SHP)-1 and SHP-2 that is mainly responsible for the inhibition of the cascade initiated by different PRRs with ITAM or the TLRs [17,18].

3. Role of PRRs in Cancer

3.1 TLRs and Cancer

The crucial role of TLRs in immunological responses and inflammation extends beyond immune cells to cancer cells, even of non-myeloid origins. This is very interesting because cancer cells can employ receptors on their surface to enable their sustenance [19]. Activated TLRs on cancer cells can enhance cancer progression, promote anti-apoptotic activity and induce resistance from the host immune system [20]. There are many cancer cells which express different types of TLRs that enhance the NF-kB signaling cascade to bring forth an anti-apoptotic response and enhanced cancer cell proliferation [19]. They instigate cancer cells to release cytokines and chemokines and recruit specific immune cells to modulate the immune response at the tumor microenvironment [21]. Phase II clinical studies have been established with LPS and treatment of colorectal and lung cancer patients [22]. LPS induced activation of TLR-4 promotes the progression of ovarian cancer by releasing the anti-apoptotic protein, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP), and phosphorylated Akt [23]. TLR5 and TLR9 expressions have been shown to be associated with low to high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and invasive cervical squamous cell carcinoma [24, 25]. Furthermore, TLRs 2, 3, 4 and 9 are expressed in lung cancer cell lines. In lung cancer, TLR-4 activated by LPS has been shown to restrict tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL)-mediated apoptosis [26]. Researchers have also shown TLR-4 to be linked to prostate and head and neck cancers, and is over expressed in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells [27]. On the contrary, it has experimentally been shown that toxins from gram negative bacteria shows anti-tumor effects [28]. Since the outer membrane of gram negative bacteria constitutes LPS which can activate TLRs, a school of thought argued that TLR activation could also lead to tumor regression [29]. Thus, contrasting literature indicates that TLR has a dual role in cancer cells, and can either modify cancer progression and chemo resistance, or suppress cancer metastasis [30].

3.2 CLRs and Cancer

It has been speculated that cancer cells, even from non-hematological origins, can employ specific receptors to evade immune attack and maintain disease progression [19]. Although the role of CLRs on solid tumor cells has not yet been elucidated, they have widely been shown to modulate the tumor microenvironment by sensing specific tumor associated antigens [31].These antigens could be membrane proteins or transformed carbohydrate patterns, like glycoproteins or glycolipids on the cell surface, which are collectively termed as tumor associated carbohydrate antigens (TACAs) [32]. The CLRs can sense these molecular patterns; hence, these antigens are identified by the CLRs of the immune cells to initiate an immunological response. Certain CLRs, like dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN), recognise carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), a well-known tumor associated antigen, overexpressed in human colorectal gastric and pancreatic carcinomas [33]. Macrophage galactose C-type lectin (MGL) has a role in sensing and binding to Neu-5Ac-Tn and Neu-5Gc-Tn tumor associated antigens [34]. Dectin-1, another well-known CLR which binds to β-glucans, has now been shown to recognise N-glycan structures on tumor cells. This was confirmed by N-glycosidase treatment, which impeded the anti-tumoral activity because of obliteration of these tumor antigens [35,36]. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are involved in the production of type-I interferons (IFN- α and β), type III interferons (IFN-γ/IL-28/29) and other pro-inflammatory cytokines [37]. An efficient strategy for the elimination of tumors requires the participation of natural killer cells (NK cells), and tumor-specific CD8+ and CD4+ cells. The probable role of CLRs in alleviating this phenomenon has now been well established (38). MGL can sense Tn antigens and it is important for efficient internalization and presentation to CD4+ T cells [39]. Furthermore, commitment of MGL with these tumor-associated antigens over expresses maturation markers of DCs, enhances motility and most importantly intensifies CD8+ T-cell activation [40]. Remarkably, CLRs can mediate anti-tumor immunity by increased production of type I and III interferons. On the other side of the coin, CLRs can potentiate anti-inflammatory responses [41] and impede TLR-mediated protective immunity, eventually sustaining the tumor microenvironment by allowing tumor cells to escape immune response [42]. There also reports on the association of DC-SIGN with tumor-associated antigens [33]. Evidences shows that such associations sustain an anti-inflammatory response and restricts tumor associated macrophage (TAM)-associated inflammation of breast and adenocarcinoma patients. This response limits anti-tumor T-cell responses [43]. Since the specific role of CLRs and their expression on solid cancer cells have not been explored in detail, preliminary indications on their expression on different types of cancers can be procured from the Human Protein Atlas [44]. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) RNA seq dataset for RNA expression overview shows enhanced RNA expression of C-type lectin 9A (CLEC9A) in testis cancer cells. CLEC9A functions as an endocytic receptor on a group of myeloid cells specialized for the uptake and processing of material from dead cells. Another CLR, Killer Cell Lectin-like Receptor (KLRF1), which is involved in the (NK)-mediated cytolysis of PHA-induced lymphoblasts and its mRNA expression, was observed in BJ hTERT+, HAP1, and U-937 cell lines [45]. Although the role of CLRs in regulating the tumor microenvironment of cancer cells remain mostly obscure, their function in cancer came to light when C-type lectin family12 member A (CLEC12A), an inhibitory CLR, was revealed to be a promising marker for leukemia cancer stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients [46]. Exclusively, in this review, we want to steer the focus on CLEC12A as a CLR which is present on cancer stem cells and a putative candidate for direct targeting as part of an effective chemotherapeutic strategy.

4. CLEC12A

CLEC12A (also known as myeloid inhibitory C-type lectin-like receptor, MICL) is an ITIM-containing inhibitory CLR, which are expressed by granulocytes, monocytes, macrophages and DCs [47,48]. This membrane-bound receptor is a homodimer and has been considered to be a marker for AML blasts. This indicates that CLEC12A has an important role in carcinogenesis, apart from its usual inhibitory functions in immune cells [47]. Supporting evidences have demonstrated that CLEC12A has endogenous ligands in cells, as soluble CLEC12A binds to single-cell suspensions isolated from different murine tissues [49]. It was primarily acknowledged that CLEC12A was an inhibitory CLR and marker for dead cells. Researchers have shown that human and murine CLEC12A identifies dead cells derived from 293T cells or thymocytes by employing a novel CLEC12A-immunoglobulin (Ig) fusion protein and reporter cells expressing CLEC12A-CD3ζ chimera [50]. To further categorise the ligand for CLEC12A, investigators treated attenuated kidney cells with DNase, RNase, trypsin, and with an inhibitor of uric acid synthesis. Interestingly, only the uric acid inhibitor could eliminate CLEC12A-Ig binding to dead cells [51]. Uric acid is soluble in normal living cells, but upon cell death, it comes in contact with extracellular sodium ions, during which uric acid forms monosodium urate (MSU) crystals. MSU, which is released from dead cells, forms a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP). Since PRRs can sense signatures from dead cells, MSU acts as a direct ligand for CLEC12A [52]. Common inflammatory arthritis called gout occurs due to deposition of MSU crystals. In CLEC12A-deficient mice, neutrophil activation was studied in response to MSU. In this study, researchers have reported that MSU induces reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in a Syk-dependent cascade, and this phenomenon was significantly heightened when CLEC12A was absent. Therefore, CLEC12A reduces MSU-responsive ROS production through inhibition of Syk activity [53]. Infiltration of neutrophils was elucidated in non-infectious inflammation, which was induced by dead cells in vivo. It was observed that response to dead cells was greatly increased in the absence of CLEC12A [54]. Therefore, CLEC12A as an inhibitory CLR, can sense dead cells and check sterile inflammation [55]. Expression of CLEC12A is reduced in pro-inflammatory conditions as it has a cytosolic ITIM domain, which can employ tyrosine phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2 to restrict the activation signals generated from the activating ITAM CLRs or the TLRs that induce inflammation [56]. CLEC12A was originally identified as an inhibitory CLR of the Dectin cluster of genes and can sense DAMPs like MSU. In contrast, another study showed that CLEC12A was activated upon sensing MSU which was released by dead cells from the host, but it also activated type-I IFN, thereby enhancing anti-viral immune response [57]. Hence, CLEC12A can maintain a balance between infection-induced inflammation and control of pathogens. In addition, inhibition of CLEC12A can clinically ameliorate persistent viral infection. CLEC12A is thus expected to act by diminishing immune response, but research suggests that ITIM can stimulate, rather than hinder, immune response [47]. The question arises whether these receptors send information independently or with association with a co-receptor will require deeper investigation. However, the dual nature of CLEC12A has limited our understanding on this area and warrants more research.

5. CLEC12A as a Marker for Cancer Stem Cells

The preponderance of expression of CLRs on solid cancer cells and cancer stem cells has not yet been elucidated in detail. However, it has been revealed to be a promising marker for leukemia blasts in AML [58]. It has been shown that CD34+/CD38-/CLEC12A+subsets were malignant and have functional stem cell-like properties in patients with AML [46]. This was specifically remarkable since normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor (CD34+/CD38- and CD34+/CD33-cell subsets) cells lack CLEC12A expression. Since then, researchers have considered therapeutic targeting of CLEC12A in treatment of AML. Erythrocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, B-cells and T-cells do not express CLEC12A; however, its expression was linked to common myeloid progenitors (CMP), granulocyte myeloid progenitors (GMP) and megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor (MEP). Cells which are positive for CLEC12A in the hematopoietic lineage are classically defined CMPs [59]. Therefore, CLEC12A can serve both as a detection marker and could be translated to targeted therapy [60]. In AML patients, there are subsets of stem cells or progenitor cells which are either normal or malignant. Several biomarkers have been investigated to differentiate the subsets of cells, one such being CLEC12A. Healthy bone marrow CD34+/CD38- subsets can be distinguished from CD34+/CD38- subsets of AML patients, in which the later revealed CLEC12A expression [61]. To confirm that these CD34+/CD38-/CLEC12A+ subsets were cancer stem cells and have malignant properties, they were injected in immunodeficient mice. The results indicated leukemia-related phenotype and the cells remained CLEC12A positive [62]. CLEC12A expression was stable in chemo-treated and G-CSF-treated patients [63]. The CD34+/CD38-cells were however negative for CLEC12A, confirming that chemotherapy did not up regulate CLEC12A expression. This study has shown that samples from patients obtained during diagnosis and relapse did not show significant alterations in CLEC12A expression [62]. On the contrary, another study indicated 45% CLEC12A expression during initial diagnosis and approximately 20% during relapse [64]. Hence, it is yet to be ascertained that CLEC12A expression is stable after chemo-treatment, although there may be other underlying factors that link CEC12A expression on the cancer stem cells that can associate it with cancer relapse. To address this conundrum, scientists have now evaluated the link between measurable residual disease (MRD) and the expression of CLEC12A [65]. MRD was detected by multiparameter flow cytometer with tagged antibodies which can detect the expression of antigens throughout treatment and relapse for differentially-expressed antigens, including CLEC12A [66]. Since CLEC12A is associated with leukemic blasts and leukemic stem cells (LSCs), therapies need to be developed targeting this appropriate diagnostic marker in the treatment of AML. CLEC12A targeted therapy will therefore most likely eliminate the residual cancer stem cells, leaving aside the normal stem cells, and will be a major breakthrough in management of AML.

6. Targeting of CLEC12A in AML

6.1 Monoclonal Antibodies

The use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in treatment of AML, with emphasis on CD33 and CD123, has led to FDA and EMA-approval of the CD33 antibody with a drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg). This mAb along with the drug conjugate mediates a dose-dependent complement-based cytoxicity (DDCC) and an antibody dependant cell cytoxicity (ADCC). The mAbs were efficiently internalized in HL-60 cells upon binding with CLEC12A. Both CD33 and CLEC12A were found to be highly upregulated at the RNA level and displayed increased cell surface expression on AML cells, as detected by flow cytometry, and are preferential immunotargets in management of AML [67]. Moreover, a lead chimeric CLEC12A mAb reduced the tumor mass in a xenograft model implanted with HL-60 cells. Several in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo experiments have revealed that CLEC12A mAbs have effective cytotoxic potential against CLEC12A-bearing cells. Although the results have been validated, phase I trials still need to confirm their therapeutic efficacy [68].

6.2 Antibody-Drug Conjugates

To further increase effectiveness of AML therapy, an anti-CD33-calicheamicin antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) has been developed [69]. However, treatment with this drug conjugate has led to side-effects, like thrombocytopenia. To overcome this drawback, an anti-CLEC12A ADC was developed, that employs a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer DNA alkylating and cross-linking agent [70,71]. This was developed by conjugating a novel self-immolative disulfide linker. This ADC proved to be effective against CLEC12A+ blasts of AML patients and tumor cells in AML xenograft models. Furthermore, in cynomolgus monkeys, no target independent toxicities were observed when administering the doses [71]. Another recent ADC that was developed was CLT030, construction of which was based on a humanized anti-CLEC12A antibody with two engineered cysteine residues, which are linked covalently by a cleavable linker to the DNA-binding D211 payload, isoquinolidinobenzodiazepine [72]. Upon binding to CLEC12A-expressing cells, it releases its DNA binding payload, is internalized and the linker is cleaved in the lysosome. It has shown strong efficacy in AML in vitro and in the AML patient-derived in vivo model. When compared to CD33-ADC, differentiation of healthy human CD34+ cells into various lineages was less affected. This study further proved its potential in treatment of AML and results from clinical studies are awaited [73].

6.3 Bispecific Antibodies

While mAbs proved their worth in AML treatment, they have completely exploited the potential of the immune system to eliminate underlying malignancies. To further develop the efficacy of antibody therapy, bispecific constructs have been created, not only to recognize the epitope on the cancer cell, but also to activate the immune responsive cells (CD3 on T-cells or CD16 on NK-cells; [74,75]. Originally, bispecific mAbs were developed by chemical cross linking or by exchange of different heavy chains as a result of fusion of two hybridoma cell lines, but their efficacy was restricted by human anti-rat and anti– mouse antibodies, the need for high effector-to-target (E:T) ratios and low yields [75,76]. Over the course of time, other bispecific antibody constructs has been developed, which lead to improved therapeutic outcome, as confirmed by trials performed in B-cell acute lymphatic leukemia (B-ALL), using the CD19-/CD3 BiTe (Bispecific T-cell engager), blinatumomab [77]. MCLA-117, a novel T cell-redirecting antibody for AML treatment was engineered, targeting CD3 on T cells and CLEC12A on leukemic cells. MCLA-117 can effectively instruct T cells to kill tumor cells while sparing the healthy hematopoietic compartment of the bone marrow. This bispecific antibody is a full length human IgG1 antibody that uses a common light chain, an anti-CLEC12A specific heavy variable gene segment and a CD3 VH heavy variable gene segment. The Fc portion of this antibody was constructed to allow heavy chain hetero-dimerization. Clinical trial of this promising bi-specific antibody is presently ongoing [78,79].

6.4 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)

Over the last few years, genetically-engineered immune effector cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) have been developed. Primary targeting CD19 have revealed strong anti-tumor potential in patients with B-lymphoblastic leukemia and other B-cell lymphoid malignancies [80-82]. This accomplishment has led to an interest in using similar approaches for the treatment of AML. Early focus with CARs and hybrid single-chain receptors were engineered with an extracellular tumor antigen. CLEC12A CAR T-cells has also been constructed which can target CLEC12A+ hematopoietic progenitor cells but not CD34+/CD38- cells from healthy donors. In vitro assays reveal that the CLEC12A-CD33 CAR had specific anti-tumor activity against CD33+and CLEC12A+ cells in vitro, as well as primary leukemia samples from AML patients [83, 84]. Murine malignancies were developed using cell lines expressing CD33 or CLEC12A and also by using the AML cell line U937 cells. In these models, CAR-T cells significantly reduced tumor size and reduced mortality [85]. CLEC12A is an ideal target for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for AML and its expression is closely linked with treatment response and patients’ survival outcome. CLEC12A plays an important immunomodulatory role in AML [86]. Bridging proteins have now been developed and are designated as ‘CAR-T cell engagers’ which is a CAR-targeted protein fused to antigen binding domains derived from antibodies. Therefore, a CD19-anti-CLEC12A bridging protein that can bind to CAR19-T cells and CLEC12A was developed. These CAR19-T cells secrete bridging proteins and have cytotoxic activity against aggressive leukemic cell lines [83].

6.5 Trispecific Killer Engager

To achieve effective targeting of leukemic blasts and leukemic stem cells, a trispecific killer engager (TriKETM) molecule containing a humanized anti-CD16 heavy chain camelid single-domain antibody (sdAb), that activates NK cells, was conceived [87]. An IL-15 molecule that drives NK-cell priming, expansion and survival, and a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) against human CLEC12A (CLEC12A TriKE) was developed, which induced NK-cell proliferation, activation and killing of both AML cell lines and primary patient-derived AML blasts in vitro, while sparing healthy hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). NK cells are important players in cancer immunotherapy. They can target and eliminate cancer cells by releasing cytotoxic granules or by CD16-mediated ADCC. CLEC12A TriKE can specifically target CLEC12A+ cells and can mediate its annihilation by NK cells. This efficient therapeutic strategy is now under phase I/II trials [87].

7. Expression of CLEC12A on Cancer Cells of Non-Hematopoietic Origin

There is insufficient evidence regarding expression of CLEC12A on cancer cells of non-hematopoietic origin. The Human Protein Atlas database records that CLEC12A expression highly correlates with urothelial cancer. There are sufficient records from patient samples on the expression of CLEC12A, but so far, there is no research on the role of CLEC12A on urothelial cancer. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry results show strong cytoplasmic staining in embryonal carcinoma of testis, stomach and urothelial cancer. It has been recorded in this database that 1 in every 10 patients with urothelial cancer show medium to high CLEC12A expression, whereas 1 in every 12 stomach and testis cancer patients show medium to high CLEC12A expression [88]. In another study, it was shown that upon silencing CLEC12A with siRNA, LCIII expression reduced significantly in HeLa cells. This study showed that CLEC12A is related to autophagy as LCIII is an autophagic marker, and paves a way to study the mechanism of CLEC12A and its relation in cancers of non-hematopoietic origin. Here, CLEC12A is designated to be important for anti-bacterial autophagy. This was a remarkable study because a genome wide association study was done for Crohn’s disease, a chronic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract. Nearly 140 genetic risk loci were recognized in which CLEC12A has shown to be related with autophagy. The authors have shown that silencing CLEC12A led to significantly reduced LCIII turnover which reverted upon overexpression of CLEC12A [89]. Since, autophagy is an important cellular physiology related to cancer prognosis, this study will open a new avenue in elucidating the role CLEC12A on cancer cells.

8. Summary

Pattern recognition receptors, like the TLRs and CLRs found on myeloid cells, sense patterns from microorganisms to orchestrate an immune response. TLRs and activating CLRs initiate a signalling cascade upon detection to activate the NF-kB family of transcription factors and augment production of inflammatory cytokines. On the other hand, CLRs with inhibitory moieties can suppress this pro-inflammatory response by restricting the activation signal. CLEC12A is one such inhibitory CLR which suppresses inflammation by dampening the activation of NF-kB. TLRs are expressed on cancer cells of non-myeloid origins. They have varied responses, can classically activate pro-inflammatory responses that lead to cancer progression or else suppress their development. There is, however, no definitive report of expression of CLRs on cancer cells of non-myeloid origins, till now, but it was recently elucidated that CLEC12A expression is related to the CSCs in AML. The role of CLEC12A in CSCs is largely unknown, and its presence on solid tumors has not yet been substantiated. Speculations implying that like TLRs, CLRs can also be present on tumors of non-haematological origins, led to the reports indicating that, CLEC12A has low to high expression in urothelial cancers. The exact mechanism by which it functions, and whether it behaves similarly to their myeloid counterparts is not yet known. Therefore, in this review we revealed a whole new avenue in the field of cancer research, indicating CLEC12A as a putative therapeutic target. How cancer cells can employ different myeloid receptors which are usually not expressed in non-hematopoietic cells, and how they use them to evade immune response and achieve their sustenance is a path which will be traversed in the years to come.


  1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Weiderpass E, et al. The ever-increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide. Cancer 127 (2021): 3029-3030.
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Health Estimates 2020: Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000-2019. WHO (2020).
  3. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Human Development Report 2019. Beyond Income, Beyond Averages, Beyond Today: Inequalities in Human Development in the 21st Century. UNDP (2019).
  4. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71 (2021): 209-249.
  5. Mancini SJC, Balabanian K, Corre I, et al. Deciphering Tumor Niches: Lessons from Solid and Hematological Malignancies. Front Immunol 12 (2021): 766275.
  6. Aurrand-Lions M, Mancini SJC. Murine Bone Marrow Niches from Hematopoietic Stem Cells to B Cells. Int J Mol Sci 19 (2018): 2353.
  7. Kalb ML, Glaser A, Stary G, et al. TRAIL (+) human plasmacytoid dendritic cells kill tumor cells in vitro: mechanisms of imiquimod- and IFN-α-mediated antitumor reactivity. J Immunol 188 (2012): 1583-1591.
  8. Yan H, Kamiya T, Suabjakyong P, et al. Targeting C-Type Lectin Receptors for Cancer Immunity. Front Immunol 6 (2015): 408.
  9. vanVliet SJ, Aarnoudse CA, Broks-van den Berg VC, et al. MGL-mediated internalization and antigen presentation by dendritic cells: a role for tyrosine-5. Eur J Immunol 37 (2007): 2075-2081.
  10. Liu G, Zhao Y. Toll-like receptors and immune regulation: their direct and indirect modulation on regulatory CD4+ CD25+ T cells. Immunology 122 (2007): 149-156.
  11. Bowyer JF, Sarkar S, Burks SM, et al. Microglial activation and responses to vasculature that result from an acute LPS exposure. Neurotoxicology 77 (2020): 181-192.
  12. Kawai T, Akira S. TLR signaling. Cell Death Differ 13 (2006): 816-825.
  13. Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 140 (2010): 805-820.
  14. Osorio F, Reis e Sousa C. Myeloid C-type lectin receptors in pathogen recognition and host defense. Immunity 34 (2011): 651-664.
  15. Sancho D, Reis e Sousa C. Signaling by myeloid C-type lectin receptors in immunity and homeostasis. Annu Rev Immunol 30 (2012): 491-529.
  16. Ifrim DC, Joosten LA, Kullberg BJ, et al. Candida albicans primes TLR cytokine responses through a Dectin-1/Raf-1-mediated pathway. J Immunol 190 (2013): 4129-4135.
  17. Hoving JC, Wilson GJ, Brown GD. Signalling C-type lectin receptors, microbial recognition and immunity. Cell Microbiol (2014): 185-194.
  18. Agier J, Pastwinska J, Brzezinska-Blaszczyk E. An overview of mast cell pattern recognition receptors. Inflamm Res 67 (2018): 737-746.
  19. Sato Y, Goto Y, Narita N, et al. Cancer Cells Expressing Toll-like Receptors and the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Microenviron 2Suppl 1(2009): 205-214.
  20. Rakoff-Nahoum S, Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptors and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 9 (2009): 57-63.
  21. Whiteside TL. The tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growth. Oncogene 27 (2008): 5904-5912.
  22. Otto F, Schmid P, Mackensen A, et al. Phase II trial of intravenous endotoxin in patients with colorectal and non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 32 (1996): 1712-1718.
  23. Dan HC, Sun M, Kaneko S, et al. Akt phosphorylation and stabilization of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP). J Biol Chem 279 (2004): 5405-5412.
  24. Kim WY, Lee JW, Choi JJ, et al. Increased expression of Toll-like receptor 5 during progression of cervical neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18 (2008): 300-305.
  25. Lee JW, Choi JJ, Seo ES, et al. Increased toll-like receptor 9 expression in cervical neoplasia. MolCarcinog 46 (2007): 941-947.
  26. He W, Liu Q, Wang L, et al. TLR4 signaling promotes immune escape of human lung cancer cells by inducing immunosuppressive cytokines and apoptosis resistance. Mol Immunol 44 (2007): 2850-2859.
  27. Yang H, Zhou H, Feng P, et al. Reduced expression of Toll-like receptor 4 inhibits human breast cancer cells proliferation and inflammatory cytokines secretion. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 29 (2010): 92.
  28. Coley WB. The treatment of malignant tumors by repeated inoculations of erysipelas. With a report of ten original cases. 1893. ClinOrthopRelat Res (1991): 3-11.
  29. Garay RP, Viens P, Bauer J, et al. Cancer relapse under chemotherapy: why TLR2/4 receptor agonists can help. Eur J Pharmacol 563 (2007): 1-17.
  30. Ahmed A, Redmond HP, Wang JH. Links between Toll-like receptor 4 and breast cancer. Oncoimmunology 2 (2013): e22945.
  31. Denda-Nagai K, Aida S, Saba K, et al. Distribution and function of macrophage galactose-type C-type lectin 2 (MGL2/CD301b): efficient uptake and presentation of glycosylated antigens by dendritic cells. J Biol Chem 285 (2010): 19193-19204.
  32. Rodrigues Mantuano N, Natoli M, Zippelius A, et al. Tumor-associated carbohydrates and immunomodulatorylectins as targets for cancer immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer 8 (2020): e001222.
  33. Nonaka M, Ma BY, Murai R, et al. Glycosylation-dependent interactions of C-type lectin DC-SIGN with colorectal tumor-associated Lewis glycans impair the function and differentiation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol 180 (2008): 3347-3356.
  34. Mortezai N, Behnken HN, Kurze AK, et al. Tumor-associated Neu5Ac-Tn and Neu5Gc-Tn antigens bind to C-type lectin CLEC10A (CD301, MGL). Glycobiology 23 (2013): 844-852.
  35. Brown GD. Dectin-1: a signalling non-TLR pattern-recognition receptor. Nat Rev Immunol 6 (2006): 33-43.
  36. Chiba S, Ikushima H, Ueki H, et al. Recognition of tumor cells by Dectin-1 orchestrates innate immune cells for anti-tumor responses. Elife 3 (2014): e04177.
  37. Guéry L, Dubrot J, Lippens C, et al. Ag-presenting CpG-activated pDCs prime Th17 cells that induce tumor regression. Cancer Res 74 (2014): 6430-6440.
  38. Suresh PK. Membrane-bound versus soluble major histocompatibility complex Class I-related chain A and major histocompatibility complex Class I-related chain B differential expression: Mechanisms of tumor eradication versus evasion and current drug development strategies. J Cancer Res Ther 12 (2016): 1224-1233.
  39. vanVliet SJ, Aarnoudse CA, Broks-van den Berg VC, et al. MGL-mediated internalization and antigen presentation by dendritic cells: a role for tyrosine-5. Eur J Immunol 37 (2007): 2075-2081.
  40. Napoletano C, Zizzari IG, Rughetti A, et al. Targeting of macrophage galactose-type C-type lectin (MGL) induces DC signaling and activation. Eur J Immunol 42 (2012): 936-945.
  41. Yan H, Ohno N, Tsuji NM. The role of C-type lectin receptors in immune homeostasis. IntImmunopharmacol 16 (2013): 353-357.
  42. Chouaib S, Asselin-Paturel C, Mami-Chouaib F, et al. The host-tumor immune conflict: from immunosuppression to resistance and destruction. Immunol Today 18 (1997): 493-497.
  43. Domínguez-Soto A, Sierra-Filardi E, Puig-Kröger A, et al. Dendritic cell-specific ICAM-3-grabbing nonintegrin expression on M2-polarized and tumor-associated macrophages is macrophage-CSF dependent and enhanced by tumor-derived IL-6 and IL-10. J Immunol 186 (2011): 2192-200.
  44. The Human Protein Atlas. []
  45. The Human Protein Atlas. []
  46. Toft-Petersen M, Nederby L, Kjeldsen E, et al. Unravelling the relevance of CLEC12A as a cancer stem cell marker in myelodysplastic syndrome. Br J Haematol 175 (2016): 393-401.
  47. Drouin M, Saenz J, Chiffoleau E. C-Type Lectin-Like Receptors: Head or Tail in Cell Death Immunity. Front Immunol 11 (2020): 251.
  48. Marshall AS, Willment JA, Pyz E, et al. Human MICL (CLEC12A) is differentially glycosylated and is down-regulated following cellular activation. Eur J Immunol 36 (2006): 2159-2169.
  49. Pyz E, Huysamen C, Marshall AS, et al. Characterisation of murine MICL (CLEC12A) and evidence for an endogenous ligand. Eur J Immunol 38 (2008): 1157-1163.
  50. Yamasaki S. Clec12a: quieting the dead. Immunity 40 (2014): 309-311.
  51. Neumann K, Castiñeiras-Vilariño M, Höckendorf U, et al. Clec12a is an inhibitory receptor for uric acid crystals that regulates inflammation in response to cell death. Immunity 40 (2014): 389-399.
  52. Shi Y, Evans JE, Rock KL. Molecular identification of a danger signal that alerts the immune system to dying cells. Nature 425 (2003): 516-521.
  53. Barabé F, Gilbert C, Liao N, et al. Crystal-induced neutrophil activation VI. Involvment of FcgammaRIIIB (CD16) and CD11b in response to inflammatory microcrystals. FASEB J 12 (1998): 209-220.
  54. Shi Y, Mucsi AD, Ng G. Monosodium urate crystals in inflammation and immunity. Immunol Rev 233 (2010): 203-217.
  55. Li K, Neumann K, Duhan V, et al. The uric acid crystal receptor Clec12A potentiates type I interferon responses. ProcNatlAcadSci U S A 116 (2019): 18544-18549.
  56. Marshall AS, Willment JA, Lin HH, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel human myeloid inhibitory C-type lectin-like receptor (MICL) that is predominantly expressed on granulocytes and monocytes. J Biol Chem 279 (2004): 14792-14802.
  57. Plato A, Willment JA, Brown GD. C-type lectin-like receptors of the dectin-1 cluster: ligands and signaling pathways. Int Rev Immunol 32 (2013): 134-156.
  58. Ngai LL, Ma CY, Maguire O, et al. Bimodal expression of potential drug target CLL-1 (CLEC12A) on CD34+ blasts of AML patients. Eur J Haematol 107 (2021): 343-353.
  59. Bill M, B van KootenNiekerk P, S Woll P et al. Mapping the CLEC12A expression on myeloid progenitors in normal bone marrow; implications for understanding CLEC12A-related cancer stem cell biology. J Cell Mol Med 22 (2018): 2311-2318.
  60. Bill M, Aggerholm A, Kjeldsen E, et al. Revisiting CLEC12A as leukaemic stem cell marker in AML: highlighting the necessity of precision diagnostics in patients eligible for targeted therapy. Br J Haematol 184 (2019): 769-781.
  61. Herrmann H, Sadovnik I, Eisenwort G, et al. Delineation of target expression profiles in CD34+/CD38- and CD34+/CD38+ stem and progenitor cells in AML and CML. Blood Adv 4 (2020): 5118-5132.
  62. vanRhenen A, van Dongen GA, Kelder A, et al. The novel AML stem cell associated antigen CLL-1 aids in discrimination between normal and leukemic stem cells. Blood 110 (2007): 2659-2666.
  63. vanRhenen A, Moshaver B, Kelder A, et al. Aberrant marker expression patterns on the CD34+CD38- stem cell compartment in acute myeloid leukemia allows to distinguish the malignant from the normal stem cell compartment both at diagnosis and in remission. Leukemia 21 (2007): 1700-1707.
  64. Haubner S, Perna F, Köhnke T, et al. Coexpression profile of leukemic stem cell markers for combinatorial targeted therapy in AML. Leukemia 33 (2019): 64-74.
  65. Schuurhuis GJ, Heuser M, Freeman S, et al. Minimal/measurable residual disease in AML: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Blood 131 (2018): 1275-1291.
  66. Zhou Y, Othus M, Araki D, et al. Pre- and post-transplant quantification of measurable ('minimal') residual disease via multiparameter flow cytometry in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 30 (2016): 1456-1464.
  67. Willier S, Rothämel P, Hastreiter M, et al. CLEC12A and CD33 coexpression as a preferential target for pediatric AML combinatorial immunotherapy. Blood 137 (2021): 1037-1049.
  68. Zhao X, Singh S, PardouxC, et al. Targeting C-type lectin-like molecule-1 for antibody-mediated immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 95 (2010): 71-78.
  69. Vollmar BS, Frantz C, Schutten MM, et al. Calicheamicin Antibody-Drug Conjugates with Improved Properties. Mol Cancer Ther 20 (2021): 1112-1120.
  70. Larson RA, Sievers EL, StadtmauerEA, et al. Final report of the efficacy and safety of gemtuzumabozogamicin (Mylotarg) in patients with CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia in first recurrence. Cancer 104 (2007): 1442-1452.
  71. Zheng B, Yu SF, Del Rosario G, et al. An Anti-CLL-1 Antibody-Drug Conjugate for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 25 (2019): 1358-1368.
  72. Morsink LM, Walter RB, Ossenkoppele GJ. Prognostic and therapeutic role of CLEC12A in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Rev 34 (2019): 26-33.
  73. Jiang YP, Liu BY, Zheng Q, et al. CLT030, a leukemic stem cell-targeting CLL1 antibody-drug conjugate for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv 2 (2018): 1738-1749.
  74. Holliger P, Hudson PJ. Engineered antibody fragments and the rise of single domains. Nat Biotechnol 23 (2005): 1126-1136.
  75. Riethmüller G. Symmetry breaking: bispecific antibodies, the beginnings, and 50 years on. Cancer Immun 12 (2012): 12.
  76. Chames P, Baty D. Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapy: the light at the end of the tunnel? MAbs 1 (2009): 539-547.
  77. Kantarjian H, Stein A, Gökbuget N, et al. Blinatumomab versus Chemotherapy for Advanced Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N Engl J Med 376 (2017): 836-847.
  78. van Loo PF, Hangalapura BN, Thordardottir S, et al. MCLA-117, a CLEC12AxCD3 bispecific antibody targeting a leukaemic stem cell antigen, induces T cell-mediated AML blast lysis. Expert OpinBiolTher 19 (2019): 721-733.
  79. Hutten TJ, Thordardottir S, Fredrix H, et al. CLEC12A-Mediated Antigen Uptake and Cross-Presentation by Human Dendritic Cell Subsets Efficiently Boost Tumor-Reactive T Cell Responses. J Immunol 197 (2016): 2715-2725.
  80. Lim WA, June CH. The Principles of Engineering Immune Cells to Treat Cancer. Cell 168 (2017): 724-740.
  81. Neelapu SS, Tummala S, Kebriaei P, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy - assessment and management of toxicities. Nat Rev ClinOncol 15 (2018): 47-62.
  82. Salter AI, Pont MJ, Riddell SR. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells: CD19 and the road beyond. Blood 131 (2018): 2621-2629.
  83. Rennert PD, Dufort FJ, Su L, et al. Anti-CD19 CAR T Cells That Secrete a Biparatopic Anti-CLEC12A Bridging Protein Have Potent Activity Against Highly Aggressive Acute Myeloid Leukemia In Vitro and In Vivo. Mol Cancer Ther 20 (2021): 2071-2081.
  84. Kenderian SS, Ruella M, Shestova O, et al. CD33-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells exhibit potent preclinical activity against human acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 29 (2015): 1637-1647.
  85. Wang J, Chen S, Xiao W, et al. CAR-T cells targeting CLL-1 as an approach to treat acute myeloid leukemia. J HematolOncol 11 (2018): 7.
  86. Li Q, Liang C, Xu X, et al. CLEC12A plays an important role in immunomodulatory function and prognostic significance of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 23 (2022): 1-13.
  87. Arvindam US, van Hauten PMM, Schirm D, et al. A trispecific killer engager molecule against CLEC12A effectively induces NK-cell mediated killing of AML cells. Leukemia 35 (2021): 1586-1596.
  88. The Human Protein Atlas: CLEC12A-Pathology. [ ENSG00000172322-CLEC12A/pathology]
  89. Begun J, Lassen KG, Jijon HB, et al. Integrated Genomics of Crohn's Disease Risk Variant Identifies a Role for CLEC12A in Antibacterial Autophagy. Cell Rep 11 (2015): 1905-1918.

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved