Antimicrobial Effect of Some Essential Oils on Some Pathogenic Bacteria in Minced Meat

Article Information

Saad M Saad1, Fahim A Shaltout1*, Nahla A Abou Elroos2, Saber B El-nahas3

1Food Control Department, Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Egypt

2Animal Health Research Institute, Shebin El koom branch, Egypt

3Food Inspector at Veterinary Quarantine, Cairo Airport, Egypt

*Corresponding Author: Fahim A Shaltout, Food Control Department, Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Egypt

Received: 20 January 2019; Accepted: 04 February 2019; Published: 21 February 2019

Citation: Saad M Saad, Fahim A Shaltout, Nahla A Abou Elroos, Saber B El-nahas. Antimicrobial Effect of Some Essential Oils on Some Pathogenic Bacteria in Minced Meat. Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research 2 (2019): 013-021.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook

Abstract

Plant essential oils (EOs) serve as a “safe” alternative to chemical or synthetic antimicrobials and antioxidants to struggle with the food borne pathogens or spoilage organisms, inhibiting lipid oxidation so, the effect of some essential oils as thyme (thymus vulgaris), cinnamon (cinnamomum zeylanicum) and garlic (Allium sativum) at concentrations (1%) as natural preservatives as well as their ability to increase the shelf life of minced meat, and also their effects on bacterial agents as Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli and sensory properties of minced meat after 3 hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day during cold storage at 4°C. The obtained results showed that treated samples revealed decreasing values of S. aureus and E. coli counts and improving sensory properties than untreated samples (control) ones. Also, thyme oil at concentration (1%) was more effective than cinnamon and garlic oils.

Keywords

Essential oils, Thyme oil, Cinnamon oil, Garlic, Minced meat

Essential oils articles Essential oils Research articles Essential oils review articles Essential oils PubMed articles Essential oils PubMed Central articles Essential oils 2023 articles Essential oils 2024 articles Essential oils Scopus articles Essential oils impact factor journals Essential oils Scopus journals Essential oils PubMed journals Essential oils medical journals Essential oils free journals Essential oils best journals Essential oils top journals Essential oils free medical journals Essential oils famous journals Essential oils Google Scholar indexed journals Thyme oil articles Thyme oil Research articles Thyme oil review articles Thyme oil PubMed articles Thyme oil PubMed Central articles Thyme oil 2023 articles Thyme oil 2024 articles Thyme oil Scopus articles Thyme oil impact factor journals Thyme oil Scopus journals Thyme oil PubMed journals Thyme oil medical journals Thyme oil free journals Thyme oil best journals Thyme oil top journals Thyme oil free medical journals Thyme oil famous journals Thyme oil Google Scholar indexed journals Cinnamon oil articles Cinnamon oil Research articles Cinnamon oil review articles Cinnamon oil PubMed articles Cinnamon oil PubMed Central articles Cinnamon oil 2023 articles Cinnamon oil 2024 articles Cinnamon oil Scopus articles Cinnamon oil impact factor journals Cinnamon oil Scopus journals Cinnamon oil PubMed journals Cinnamon oil medical journals Cinnamon oil free journals Cinnamon oil best journals Cinnamon oil top journals Cinnamon oil free medical journals Cinnamon oil famous journals Cinnamon oil Google Scholar indexed journals Garlic articles Garlic Research articles Garlic review articles Garlic PubMed articles Garlic PubMed Central articles Garlic 2023 articles Garlic 2024 articles Garlic Scopus articles Garlic impact factor journals Garlic Scopus journals Garlic PubMed journals Garlic medical journals Garlic free journals Garlic best journals Garlic top journals Garlic free medical journals Garlic famous journals Garlic Google Scholar indexed journals Minced meat articles Minced meat Research articles Minced meat review articles Minced meat PubMed articles Minced meat PubMed Central articles Minced meat 2023 articles Minced meat 2024 articles Minced meat Scopus articles Minced meat impact factor journals Minced meat Scopus journals Minced meat PubMed journals Minced meat medical journals Minced meat free journals Minced meat best journals Minced meat top journals Minced meat free medical journals Minced meat famous journals Minced meat Google Scholar indexed journals Staphylococcus aureus articles Staphylococcus aureus Research articles Staphylococcus aureus review articles Staphylococcus aureus PubMed articles Staphylococcus aureus PubMed Central articles Staphylococcus aureus 2023 articles Staphylococcus aureus 2024 articles Staphylococcus aureus Scopus articles Staphylococcus aureus impact factor journals Staphylococcus aureus Scopus journals Staphylococcus aureus PubMed journals Staphylococcus aureus medical journals Staphylococcus aureus free journals Staphylococcus aureus best journals Staphylococcus aureus top journals Staphylococcus aureus free medical journals Staphylococcus aureus famous journals Staphylococcus aureus Google Scholar indexed journals preservatives  articles preservatives  Research articles preservatives  review articles preservatives  PubMed articles preservatives  PubMed Central articles preservatives  2023 articles preservatives  2024 articles preservatives  Scopus articles preservatives  impact factor journals preservatives  Scopus journals preservatives  PubMed journals preservatives  medical journals preservatives  free journals preservatives  best journals preservatives  top journals preservatives  free medical journals preservatives  famous journals preservatives  Google Scholar indexed journals antioxidants  articles antioxidants  Research articles antioxidants  review articles antioxidants  PubMed articles antioxidants  PubMed Central articles antioxidants  2023 articles antioxidants  2024 articles antioxidants  Scopus articles antioxidants  impact factor journals antioxidants  Scopus journals antioxidants  PubMed journals antioxidants  medical journals antioxidants  free journals antioxidants  best journals antioxidants  top journals antioxidants  free medical journals antioxidants  famous journals antioxidants  Google Scholar indexed journals food processing environments articles food processing environments Research articles food processing environments review articles food processing environments PubMed articles food processing environments PubMed Central articles food processing environments 2023 articles food processing environments 2024 articles food processing environments Scopus articles food processing environments impact factor journals food processing environments Scopus journals food processing environments PubMed journals food processing environments medical journals food processing environments free journals food processing environments best journals food processing environments top journals food processing environments free medical journals food processing environments famous journals food processing environments Google Scholar indexed journals foodborne diseases articles foodborne diseases Research articles foodborne diseases review articles foodborne diseases PubMed articles foodborne diseases PubMed Central articles foodborne diseases 2023 articles foodborne diseases 2024 articles foodborne diseases Scopus articles foodborne diseases impact factor journals foodborne diseases Scopus journals foodborne diseases PubMed journals foodborne diseases medical journals foodborne diseases free journals foodborne diseases best journals foodborne diseases top journals foodborne diseases free medical journals foodborne diseases famous journals foodborne diseases Google Scholar indexed journals

Article Details

1. Introduction

Meat and meat products are the most palatable of highly nutritive value foods for human being as they are important sources for protein, fat, essential amino acids, minerals, vitamins and other nutrients [1]. On the other hand, they are considered as an ideal culture medium for growth of many organisms because of the high moisture, the high percentage of nitrogenous compounds, plentiful supply of minerals, some fermentable carbohydrates (glycogen) and of a favorable pH for most microorganisms [2]. Poor hygienic practices in food processing plants may result in the contamination of food products with pathogens causing a serious risk for human health. Moreover, the complete elimination of pathogens from food processing environments is a difficult task, in part because bacteria can attach to food contact surfaces and form biofilms where they survive even after cleaning and disinfection [3]. Natural products, such as essential oils (EOs) which are produced by the secondary metabolism of herbs and/or spices and their constituents have uses in human consumption as functional food (nutraceuticals, biopolymers) and food additives (flavourings, antioxidant and antimicrobial) [4]. Food industry is facing great challenges to produce safe and at the same time food without synthetic chemical preservatives. So essential oils make their way into the scientific focus, due to their antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activity, as well as antioxidant properties, they are used to prevent foodborne diseases, to extend shelf-life and to improve some meat characteristics [5]. These generally recognized as safe (GRAS) natural substances which inhibit lipid oxidation in foods and thus offer the promise of providing natural food additives to food products [4]. Thyme is commonly used in foods mainly for its flavor and aroma. Also, thymol, which is found in thyme, has been commercially available as part of mouthwash for more than hundred years. Cinnamon can be used as spice because of its sweet flavoring and spicy characteristics. It also plays an important role in pharmacological effects such as: anti inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxic properties [6]. Garlic is one of the most commonly used ingredients as a flavor enhancement. Garlic has awide spectrum of actions, not only antibacterial, antifungal and antiprotozoal, but also it has beneficial effects on the cardiovascular and immune systems. Therefore, the present work was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of thyme, Cinnamon and garlic essential oils as antimicrobial agents in control of Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli in minced meat and enhancement of shelf life of these meat using some essential oils as thyme, Cinnamon and garlic.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Essential oils

The ready-made herbal oils of (1%) thyme (Thymus vulgaris), (1%) cinnamon (cinnamomum zeylanicum) and (1%) garlic (Allium Sativum) used in this study were purchased from Elgamhoria Co., Sharkia, Egypt. All the used chemicals were of analytical reagent grade. These oils were stored in amber- colored bottles at 4°C until use.

2.2 Minced beef

A total of 2400 gm of the fresh minced beef used in this study was purchased from different butcher shops in El Menofiya Governorate. Aiming to eliminate natural bacterial populations, Minced meat samples put under the UV light in the cabinet for 20 minutes in order to be completely sterilized from any microorganisms attached to its surface.

2.3 Bacterial strain and culture media

Escherichia coli count determined by plating appropriate dilutions on EMB agar, Staphylococus aureus count was determined on Baired Parker agar, both obtained from Media Unite, Food Hygiene Department, Animal Health Research Institute, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.

2.4 Preparation of sample

The samples were immediately prepared and divided into two equal groups (1200 gm each) One group was inoculated with E-coli ( O26:H111) (2 × 106 cfu/g) and the other group was inoculated with Staphylococus aureus (5 × 106 cfu/g), then mixed thoroughly by gently squeezing the bags by hand. Each main group was subdivided into 4 equal subgroups (100 g each ), the number of cfu/ml was considered as initial inoculum load to inoculate into fresh minced beef samples. The inoculated minced beef samples were kept for 20 minutes to allow attachment and absorption of the inoculated bacteria [7]. Essential oils of thyme, cinnamon and garlic (%v/g) were added to the minced beef groups to achieve final concentration (1%). PBS was used as control. The essential oils were mixed with the minced beef samples for a further 30 seconds to ensure even mixing. All the samples with oils and the controls were packed in polyethylene bags, labeled and stored at 4ºC. Sensory (color, odor, texture and overall acceptability) and Staph. aureus and E-coli counts analyses were conducted after 3 hours and 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day during storage, using the serial dilutions and spread plate technique [8].

2.5 Statistical analysis

ANOVA was carried out on data of the sensory, chemical and microbiological evaluations.

3. Results

Results in Table 1 showed that in case of using thyme oil (1%) the scores of color evaluation were 8, 6, 5, 4, 3 and 2 after 3 hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day of the storage period respectively, while in case of using cinnamon oil (1%) the scores were 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 and 2 after 3 hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day of the storage period respectively, but in case of using garlic oil (1%) the scores were 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 after 3 hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day of the storage period respectively.

Groups

Oil conc.

3 hrs

1st day

2nd day

3rd day

4th day

5th day

Control

-

6

4

4

3

2

1

Thyme

1%

8

6

5

4

3

2

Cinnamon

1%

7

6

5

4

3

2

Garlic

1%

7

6

5

4

3

2

core System for Sensory Evaluation [9]: 1-Very very poor; 2-Very poor; 3-Poor; 4-Fair; 5-Medium; 6-Good; 7-Very good; 8-Very very good; 9-Excellent.

Table 1: Effect of (1%) thyme, cinnamon and garlic essential oils on color of inoculated minced beef during cold storage at 4ºC.

The data recorded in Table 2 demonstrated that in case of using (1%) concentration of thyme oil the scores of odor evaluation were 8, 7, 6, 5, 4 and 2 after 3 hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day of the storage period respectively, while in case of using (1%) concentrations of cinnamon oil the scores were 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 and 2 after 3 hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day of the storage period respectively, but in case of using (1%) concentration of garlic oil the scores were 6, 5, 5, 3, 3 and 2 after 3 hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day of the storage period respectively.

Groups

oil conc.

3 hrs

1st day

2nd day

3rd day

4th day

5th day

Control

-

7

6

5

4

2

2

Thyme

1%

8

7

6

5

4

2

Cinnamon

1%

7

6

5

4

3

2

Garlic

1%

6

5

5

3

3

2

core System for Sensory Evaluation [9]: 1-Very very poor; 2-Very poor; 3-Poor; 4-Fair; 5-Medium; 6-Good; 7-Very good; 8-Very very good; 9-Excellent.

Table 2: Effect of (1%) thyme, cinnamon and garlic essential oils on odor of inoculated minced beef during cold storage at 4ºC.

The data in Table 3, in case of using thyme oil at the concentrations (1%) the scores of texture were 8, 6, 5, 4, 3 and 2 after 3 hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day of the storage period respectively, while in case of using (1%) concentration of cinnamon oil, the scores were 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 and 2 after 3 hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day of the storage period respectively, but in case of using 1% concentration of garlic oil the scores were 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 and 2 after 3 hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day of the storage period respectively.

Groups

oil conc.

3 hrs

1st day

2nd day

3rd day

4th day

5th day

Control

-

6

5

4

3

2

1

Thyme

1%

8

6

5

4

3

2

Cinnamon

1%

7

6

5

4

3

2

Garlic

1%

7

6

5

4

3

2

core System for Sensory Evaluation [9]: 1-Very very poor; 2-Very poor; 3-Poor; 4-Fair; 5-Medium; 6-Good; 7-Very good; 8-Very very good; 9-Excellent.

Table 3: Effect of (1%) thyme, cinnamon and garlic essential oils on texture of inoculated minced beef during cold storage at 4ºC.

Concerning to the overall acceptability, the results obtained in Table 4 revealed that in case of using (1%) concentrations of thyme oil the scores were 8, 7, 6, 5, 4 and 3 after 3 hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day of the storage period respectively, while in case of using 1% concentration of cinnamon oil the scores were 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 and 2 after 3 hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day of the storage period respectively, but in case of using 1% concentration of garlic oil the scores were 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 and 2 after 3hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day of the storage period respectively. The results recorded in Table 5 In case of using the concentration of (1%) of thyme oil, S. aureus counts were 7.01, 6.02, 5.52, 5.01 and 3.52 log10 cfu/g after 3 hrs, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days and 4 days of inoculation respectively, but not detected after 5 days of inoculation, comparing to S. aureus counts in the control samples which were 8.75, 8.93, 9.63, 10.50 and 10.71 log10 cfu/g after 3 hrs, 1 day, 2 days 3 days and 4 days of inoculation respectively, but not detected after 5 days of inoculation.

Groups

oil conc.

3 hrs

1st day

2nd day

3rd day

4th day

5th day

Control

-

6

5

4

3

2

1

Thyme

1%

8

7

6

5

4

3

Cinnamon

1%

7

6

5

4

3

2

Garlic

1%

7

6

5

4

3

2

core System for Sensory Evaluation [9]: 1-Very very poor; 2-Very poor; 3-Poor; 4-Fair; 5-Medium; 6-Good; 7-Very good; 8-Very very good; 9-Excellent.

Table 4: Effect of (1%) thyme, cinnamon and garlic essential oils on overall acceptability of inoculated minced beef during cold storage at 4ºC.

Groups

oil conc.

3 hrs

1st day

2nd day

3rd day

4th day

5th day

Control

-

8.75 ± 6.91

8.93 ± 8.29

9.63 ± 9.06

10.50 ± 9.24

10.71 ± 10.51

ND

Thyme

1%

7.01 ± 5.72

6.02 ± 4.72

5.52 ± 4.64

5.01 ± 3.80

3.52 ± 2.96

ND

Cinnamon

1%

7.01 ± 5.72

6.02 ± 4.72

5.52 ± 4.64

5.01 ± 3.80

3.52 ± 2.96

ND

Garlic

1%

9.20 ± 8.21

8.54 ± 7.00

7.75 ± 6.30

6.60 ± 5.75

6.06 ± 4.65

ND

Initial load of S. aureus=10.86 ± 9.24 log CFU/g; The values represent Mean ± SD of three experiments.

Table 5: Antimicrobial effect of (1%) thyme, cinnamon and garlic essential oils in control of Staphylococcus aureus (log cfu/g)artificially inoculated in minced beef during cold storage at 4ºC.

Groups

Oil conc.

3 hrs

1st day

2nd day

3rd day

4th day

5th day

Thyme

1%

35.451

44.567

49.171

53.867

67.587

-

Cinnamon

1%

28.361

37.753

44.383

53.775

57.735

-

Garlic

1%

15.285

21.363

28.637

39.227

44.199

-

Table 6: Reduction % of S.aureus count artificially inoculated into minced beef samples treated with (1%) thyme, cinnamon and garlic oils.

In case of using cinnamon oil at a concentration of (1%), S. aureus counts were 7.01, 6.02, 5.52, 5.01 and  3.52 log10 cfu/g after 3 hrs, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days and 4 days of inoculation respectively, but not detected after 5 days of inoculation, comparing to S. aureus counts in the control samples which were 8.75, 8.93, 9.63, 10.50 and 10.71 log10 cfu/g after 3 hrs, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days and 4 days of inoculation respectively, but not detected after 5 days of inoculation. At the concentration of 1% garlic oil, S. aureus counts were 9.20, 8.54, 7.75, 6.60 and 6.06 log10 cfu/g after 3 hrs, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days and 4 days of inoculation respectively, but not detected after 5 days of inoculation, comparing to S. aureus counts in the control samples which were 8.75, 8.93, 9.63, 10.50 and 10.71 log10 cfu/g after 3 hrs, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days and 4 days of inoculation respectively, but not detected after 5 days of inoculation. Table 7.

Groups

oil conc.

3 hrs

1st day

2nd day

3rd day

4th day

5th day

Control

-

6.06 ± 7.04

5.42 ± 7.50

7.24 ± 7.54

5.86 ± 8.00

6.98 ± 9.13

ND

thyme

1%

4.13 ± 5.04

2.42 ± 4.54

2.90 ± 4.20

3.27 ± 3.25

2.95 ± 3.10

ND

cinnamon

1%

4.78 ± 6.08

4.05 ± 5.10

0.78 ± 4.53

2.75 ± 4.10

2.42 ± 4.05

ND

garlic

1%

4.75 ± 6.11

6.27 ± 5.91

4.00 ± 5.51

3.56 ± 4.66

3.00 ± 4.49

ND

Initial load of E. coli=7.90 ± 5.70 log cfu/g; The values represent Mean ± SD of three experiments.

Table 7: Antimicrobial effect of (1%) thyme, cinnamon and garlic essential oils in control of Escherichia coli (log cfu/g) artificially inoculated in minced beef during cold storage at 4ºC.

Groups

Oil conc.

3 hrs

1st day

2nd day

3rd day

4th day

5th day

Thyme

1%

36.203

42.531

46.835

58.861

60.759

-

Cinnamon

1%

23.038

35.443

42.659

48.101

48.734

-

Garlic

1%

22.658

25.189

30.253

41.013

43.165

-

Table 8: Reduction % of E. coli count artificially inoculated into minced beef samples treated with (1%) thyme, cinnamon and garlic oils.

At the concentration of (1%) thyme oil, E. coli counts were  4.13, 2.42, 2.90, 3.27 and 2.95 log10 cfu/g after 3 hrs, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days and 4 days of inoculation respectively, but not detected after 5 days of inoculation, comparing to E. coli counts in the control samples which were 6.06, 5.42, 7.24, 5.86 and 6.98 log10 cfu/g after 3 hrs, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days and 4 days of inoculation respectively, but not detected after 5 days of inoculation. In case of using cinnamon oil at a concentration of (1%), E. coli counts were 4.78, 4.05, 0.78, 2.75 and 2.42 log10 cfu/g after 3 hrs, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days and 4 days of inoculation respectively, but not detected after 5 days of inoculation. At the concentration of (1%) garlic oil, E. coli counts were 4.75, 6.27, 4.00, 3.56 and 3.00 log10 cfu/g after 3 hrs, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days and 4 days of inoculation respectively, but not detected after 5 days of inoculation, comparing to E. coli counts in the control samples which were 6.06, 5.42, 7.24, 5.86 and 6.98 log10 cfu/g after 3 hrs, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days and 4 days of inoculation respectively, but not detected after 5 days of inoculation.

4. Discussion

The meat preservatives restrict microbial activity that cause deterioration and spoilage of meat and meat products [10], but The major problem with their application is their carcinogenic nature. So, natural compounds derived from herbs or plants are recommended to be used either completely or partially substituting chemical preservatives [11,  12]. Essential oils will result in immediate reduction of bacterial population [13] and might be more effective against food borne pathogens and spoilage bacteria when applied directly on foods ready to be used, containing a high protein level at acidic pH, as well as, lower levels of fat or carbohydrates [14]. The sensory properties of different treated minced beef samples during cold storage (4ºC) were improved by using concentration (1%) of thyme, cinnamon and garlic oils, compared to the control samples after 3 hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day of the storage period.

Concerning to the antimicrobial effect of (1%) concentration of tested essential oils on Staph. aureus and E. coli count in artificially inoculated minced beef samples, the results showed that the control samples had the highest counts of Staph. aureus and E. coli at any time of cold storage compared to other treatments. The antimicrobial properties of essential oils against various pathogenic microorganisms are contributed to the presence of a large number of alkaloids, phenols, terpenes derivatives compounds and other antimicrobial compounds. These compounds possess hydrophobic characteristics, which enable them to partition the lipids of bacterial cell membrane and mitochondria and interact with different targets of microbial cell (e.g., cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane), causing loss of cellular constituents, collapse of membrane structure, loss of membrane integrity, dissipation of proton motive force, sequential inhibition of respiration and ion transport processes, impairment of a variety of protective enzymes, involved in the production of energy or synthesis of structural components in microbial cells, possibly through reaction with sulfhydryl compounds or through more non specific interactions with the protein, alteration in the morphology, structure and function, modification in the transport of nutrients, membrane disruption, extensive leakages from bacterial cells or exit of critical molecules and ions leading to cell death [15]. The antimicrobial activities of thyme (thymus vulgaris) is likely due to their high content of thymol which is among the most efficient herbal antibacterial agent known the working of thymol against S. aureus was hypothesized to that thymol binds to membrane proteins hydrophobically and by means of hydrogen bonding, thereby changing the permeability characteristics of the membrane. Thymol was found to be more inhibitive at pH 5.5 than 6.5. At low pH the thymol molecule would be undissociated and therefore more hydrophobic, and so may bind better to the hydrophobic areas of proteins and dissolve better in the lipid phase [16, 17].

Garlic oil (Allium sativum) provides antimicrobial benefits, where garlic oil is rich in organosulfur compounds and their precursors (allicin, dially sulfide and diallyltrisulfides) inhibiting the growth of a lot of pathogens as E. coli and S. aureus, extending the shelf life of the product, so the garlic extracts are potentially useful in preserving meat products. the application of these garlic derived compounds in meat or other food systems could enhance color, lipid and microbial safety [18, 19]. Essential oils may successfully inhibit microbial respiration and increase the plasma membrane permeability, which resulted in death of bacterial cells after massive ion leakage. It may also happen due to hydrophilic nature of bacterial cell wall [11, 20, 21]. Essential oils possess a significant antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli in the following order: thyme>cinnamon>garlic.

5. Conclusion

The obtained results in this study concluded that thyme, cinnamon and garlic oils can be used as natural meat preservatives with antimicrobial activities against food borne pathogens and therefore may be useful in meat industry enhance safety and shelf life meat by controlling of food poisoning bacteria. So, it is recommended to replace chemical preservatives by natural ones as thyme, cinnamon and garlic oils.

References

  1. Biesalski HK. Meat as acomponent of a healthy diet. Are there any risks or benefits if meat is avoided in the diet. Meat Science 70 (2005): 509-524.
  2. Al-Mutairi M. The incidence of Enterobacteriaceae causing food poisoning in some meat products. Advance J of Food Science and Technology 3 (2011): 116-121.
  3. Yang L, Liu Y, Wu H, et al. Combating biofilms. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 65 (2012): 146-157.
  4. Zengin H, Baysal A. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Thyme and Clove Essential Oils and Application in Minced Beef. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 94 (2014): 1261-1271.
  5. Akthar MS, Degaga B, Azam T. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils extracted from medicinal plants against the pathogenic microorganisms: A review. Biological Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research 2 (2014): 1-7.
  6. Mishra N, Behak KK. Antimicrobial activity of some spices against selected microbes. Int J Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2 (2010): 187-196.
  7. Dubal ZB, Paturkar AM, Waskar VS, et al. Effect of food grade organic acids on inoculated Staph. aureus, L. monocytogenes, E. coli and typhimurium in sheep/goat meat stored at refrigeration temperature. J Meat Sci 66 (2004): 817-821.
  8. Jay JM. Modern Food Microbiology, (4th ), NewYork: Chapman and Hall (1992).
  9. Pearson MA, Tauber WF. Processed meat. (2nd ), AVI Pub. Com, Inc. West port, Connection (1984): 93.
  10. Yadav AS, Singh RP. Natural preservatives in poultry meat products. Natural Product Radiance 3 (2004).
  11. Gammariello D, Adeniyi B. Effects of natural compounds on microbial safety and sensory quality of Fior di Latte cheese, a typical Italian cheese. J Dairy Sci 91 (2008): 4138-4146.
  12. Hyldgaard M, Mygind T, Meyer RL. Essential oils in food preservation: mode of action, synergies, and interactions with food matrix components. Front Microbiogy 3 (2012): 12.
  13. Seydim AC, Sarikus G. Antimicrobial activity of whey protein based edible films incorporated with oregano, rosemary and garlic essential oils. Food Res. Int, 39 (2006): 639-644.
  14. Gutierrez J, Barry-Ryan C, Bourke P. Antimicrobial activity of plant essential oils using food model media: Efficacy, synergistic potential and interactions with food components. Food Microbiology 26 (2008): 142-150.
  15. Canillac N, Mourey A. Effects of several environmental factors on the anti-Listeria monocytogenes activity of an essential oil of Piceaexcelsa. International Journal of Food Microbiology 92 (2004): 95-103.
  16. Sivropoulou A, Papanikolaou E, Nikolanou C, et al. Antimicrobial andcytotoxic activities of Origanum essential oils. J Agrie Food Chem 44 (1996): 1202-1205.
  17. Helander IM, Alakomi HL, Latva-Kala K, et al. Characterization of the action of selected essential oil components on Gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 46 (1998): 3590-3595.
  18. Uhart M, Maks N, Ravishankar S. Effect of spices on growth and survival of Salmonella Typhimurium DT 104 in ground beef stored at 4 and 8ºC. J Food Safety 26 (2006): 115-125.
  19. Jolly D, Menon V. Antibacterial effect of garlic and ginger extracts on Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes. International Journal of Applied and Pure Science and Agriculture (IJAPSA) 1 (2015): 111-118.
  20. Burt S. Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods- a review. Int J Food Microbiol 94 (2004): 223-253.
  21. Stojanovic-Radic Z, Nesic M, Comic L, et al. Antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity of commercial rosemary essential oil (Rosmarinus officinalis L.). BiologicaNyssana 1 (2010): 83-88.

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved