An Old Technique for Epidural Intravascular Test Dose in Parturients: Fentanyl Injection

An Old Technique for Epidural Intravascular Test Dose in Parturients: Fentanyl Injection

Article Information

Roland Kaddoum^1†, Sahar Siddik-Sayyid^2†, Jowana Ramadan³, Amro Khalili^4*

¹Roland Kaddoum, MD, Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

²Sahar Siddik-Sayyid, MD, FRCA, Professor of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

³Jowana Ramadan, MD, Anesthesiology Resident, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

⁴Amro Khalili, MD, EDAIC, Instructor of Clinical Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

^†Roland Kaddoum and Sahar Siddik-Sayyid equally contributed to the article as first authors.

^*Corresponding Author: Amro Khalili, Instructor of Clinical Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, B-floor, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), American University of Beirut (AUB), Hamra, Beirut, Lebanon.

Received: 04 July 2023; Accepted: 18 July 2023; Published: 26 July 2023

Citation: Roland Kaddoum, Sahar Siddik-Sayyid, Jowana Ramadan, Amro Khalili. An Old Technique for Epidural Intravascular Test Dose in Parturients: Fentanyl Injection. Archives of Clinical and Medical Case Reports. 7 (2023): 322-323.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook

Keywords

Epidural Anesthesia; Test Dose; Local Anesthetics; Epidural Fentanyl

Epidural Anesthesia articles, Test Dose articles; Local Anesthetics articles; Epidural Fentanyl articles

Epidural Anesthesia articles Epidural Anesthesia Research articles Epidural Anesthesia review articles Epidural Anesthesia PubMed articles Epidural Anesthesia PubMed Central articles Epidural Anesthesia 2023 articles Epidural Anesthesia 2024 articles Epidural Anesthesia Scopus articles Epidural Anesthesia impact factor journals Epidural Anesthesia Scopus journals Epidural Anesthesia PubMed journals Epidural Anesthesia medical journals Epidural Anesthesia free journals Epidural Anesthesia best journals Epidural Anesthesia top journals Epidural Anesthesia free medical journals Epidural Anesthesia famous journals Epidural Anesthesia Google Scholar indexed journals Anesthesia articles Anesthesia Research articles Anesthesia review articles Anesthesia PubMed articles Anesthesia PubMed Central articles Anesthesia 2023 articles Anesthesia 2024 articles Anesthesia Scopus articles Anesthesia impact factor journals Anesthesia Scopus journals Anesthesia PubMed journals Anesthesia medical journals Anesthesia free journals Anesthesia best journals Anesthesia top journals Anesthesia free medical journals Anesthesia famous journals Anesthesia Google Scholar indexed journals Test Dose articles Test Dose Research articles Test Dose review articles Test Dose PubMed articles Test Dose PubMed Central articles Test Dose 2023 articles Test Dose 2024 articles Test Dose Scopus articles Test Dose impact factor journals Test Dose Scopus journals Test Dose PubMed journals Test Dose medical journals Test Dose free journals Test Dose best journals Test Dose top journals Test Dose free medical journals Test Dose famous journals Test Dose Google Scholar indexed journals Local Anesthetics articles Local Anesthetics Research articles Local Anesthetics review articles Local Anesthetics PubMed articles Local Anesthetics PubMed Central articles Local Anesthetics 2023 articles Local Anesthetics 2024 articles Local Anesthetics Scopus articles Local Anesthetics impact factor journals Local Anesthetics Scopus journals Local Anesthetics PubMed journals Local Anesthetics medical journals Local Anesthetics free journals Local Anesthetics best journals Local Anesthetics top journals Local Anesthetics free medical journals Local Anesthetics famous journals Local Anesthetics Google Scholar indexed journals Ultrasound articles Ultrasound Research articles Ultrasound review articles Ultrasound PubMed articles Ultrasound PubMed Central articles Ultrasound 2023 articles Ultrasound 2024 articles Ultrasound Scopus articles Ultrasound impact factor journals Ultrasound Scopus journals Ultrasound PubMed journals Ultrasound medical journals Ultrasound free journals Ultrasound best journals Ultrasound top journals Ultrasound free medical journals Ultrasound famous journals Ultrasound Google Scholar indexed journals treatment articles treatment Research articles treatment review articles treatment PubMed articles treatment PubMed Central articles treatment 2023 articles treatment 2024 articles treatment Scopus articles treatment impact factor journals treatment Scopus journals treatment PubMed journals treatment medical journals treatment free journals treatment best journals treatment top journals treatment free medical journals treatment famous journals treatment Google Scholar indexed journals CT articles CT Research articles CT review articles CT PubMed articles CT PubMed Central articles CT 2023 articles CT 2024 articles CT Scopus articles CT impact factor journals CT Scopus journals CT PubMed journals CT medical journals CT free journals CT best journals CT top journals CT free medical journals CT famous journals CT Google Scholar indexed journals Seminoma articles Seminoma Research articles Seminoma review articles Seminoma PubMed articles Seminoma PubMed Central articles Seminoma 2023 articles Seminoma 2024 articles Seminoma Scopus articles Seminoma impact factor journals Seminoma Scopus journals Seminoma PubMed journals Seminoma medical journals Seminoma free journals Seminoma best journals Seminoma top journals Seminoma free medical journals Seminoma famous journals Seminoma Google Scholar indexed journals Vitrectomy articles Vitrectomy Research articles Vitrectomy review articles Vitrectomy PubMed articles Vitrectomy PubMed Central articles Vitrectomy 2023 articles Vitrectomy 2024 articles Vitrectomy Scopus articles Vitrectomy impact factor journals Vitrectomy Scopus journals Vitrectomy PubMed journals Vitrectomy medical journals Vitrectomy free journals Vitrectomy best journals Vitrectomy top journals Vitrectomy free medical journals Vitrectomy famous journals Vitrectomy Google Scholar indexed journals Epidural Fentanyl articles Epidural Fentanyl Research articles Epidural Fentanyl review articles Epidural Fentanyl PubMed articles Epidural Fentanyl PubMed Central articles Epidural Fentanyl 2023 articles Epidural Fentanyl 2024 articles Epidural Fentanyl Scopus articles Epidural Fentanyl impact factor journals Epidural Fentanyl Scopus journals Epidural Fentanyl PubMed journals Epidural Fentanyl medical journals Epidural Fentanyl free journals Epidural Fentanyl best journals Epidural Fentanyl top journals Epidural Fentanyl free medical journals Epidural Fentanyl famous journals Epidural Fentanyl Google Scholar indexed journals

Article Details

Dear Editor

Lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000 (3 mL) is the most frequently used and effective test dose following placement of an epidural catheter for the detection of intrathecal or intravascular placement. Alone, it may not be effective, but in combination with aspiration, fractionation of epidural local anesthetic injection, and clinical judgment, adverse outcomes may be avoided. It has been suggested that the epidural test dose used for women in labor consisting of local anesthetic and epinephrine is sensitive but not specific. Some cases of positive test dose don’t reflect a true intravascular placement of the epidural catheter, causing the catheters to be unnecessarily re-sited [1].

Earlier, fentanyl 100 μg has been suggested as an appropriate test dose in laboring women, with 92.4% sensitivity and 92% specificity [2]. A test dose can thus be considered as positive in case of signs of sedation, drowsiness, or dizziness described by the patient within 5 minutes after injection of 100 μg of fentanyl [3]. These side effects were not reported to be disturbing or unpleasant for the patient [4]. If fentanyl is used as a test dose for intravascular placement, its administration must follow a dose of local anesthetic sufficient to exclude intrathecal placement.

In pregnancy, the epidural veins are engorged leading to occasional inadvertent injury during epidural placement. The appearance of bloody fluid immediately after catheter placement suggests that epidural blood vessels are injured. Frank blood that is emitted spontaneously or by negative pressure from the epidural catheter is suggestive that the catheter is inserted directly into a vein. In such clear-cut cases, test dose is not needed, and the epidural must be directly replaced to avoid the catastrophic complications. We postulate that an intravascular test dose with lidocaine and epinephrine in the presence of either a negative aspiration or bloody fluid in the catheter can yield a false positive result secondary to the leakage of epinephrine into a small vein that was injured by the insertion of epidural catheter or needle, without having the catheter necessarily lodged in that vein. In such cases, we recommend administering fentanyl 100 μg epidurally, wait for approximately 30 min before repeating the test dose with epinephrine. Symptoms of dizziness or drowsiness that might appear within 5 minutes indicate an intravascular injection of fentanyl either secondary to the intravascular placement of catheter or the absorption of fentanyl by the injured vein, similarly to epinephrine. One advantage is pain relief provided by fentanyl to the laboring patient. The absence of these symptoms means that fentanyl was administered probably in the epidural space, thus ensuring analgesia until a second epinephrine test dose can be given. After a waiting time of 30 min following the fentanyl test dose, the possibly injured vessel would clot, and a second test dose of epinephrine is more likely to be negative, confirming the correct placement and thus avoiding unnecessary re-siting of the epidural catheter. This technique would be advantageous in patients with a challenging difficult spine and in patients complaining of severe pain while siting the epidural.

Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

None.

Authors' Contributions

Roland Kaddoum and Sahar-Siddik Sayyid have equal contribution to the article as first authors in discussing, drafting, and approving the final version of the manuscript. Jowana Ramadan contributed to drafting and approving the final version of the manuscript. Amro Khalili contributed to discussing, drafting, and approving the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

References

Norris MC, Fogel ST, Dalman H, Borrenpohl S, Hoppe W, Riley A. Labor epidural analgesia without an intravascular test dose. Anesthesiology 88 (1998): 1495-1501.
Galindo Gualdrón LA. Test dose in regional anesthesia. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol 42 (2014): 47-52.
Guay J. The epidural test dose: a review. Anesth Analg 102 (2006): 921-929.
Yoshii WY, Miller M, Rottman RL, et al. Fentanyl for epidural intravascular test dose in obstetrics. Reg Anesth 18 (1993): 296-299.