Acute and Maintenance Efficacy of Deep TMS in Depression with Mixed Features

Article Information

Jean-Michel Azorin*MD, Christophe Gouraud RN, Léa Guintrand RN

Clinique l’Emeraude, Clinea, 34 Traverse de la Seigneurie, 13009 Marseille, France

*Corresponding Author: Jean-Michel Azorin, Clinique l’Emeraude, Clinea, 34 Traverse de la Seigneurie, 13009 Marseille, France

Received: 23 October 2020; Accepted: 02 November 2020; Published: 04 November 2020

Citation: Jean-Michel Azorin, Christophe Gouraud RN, Léa Guintrand RN. Acute and Maintenance Efficacy of Deep TMS in Depression with Mixed Features. Journal of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Disorders 4 (2020): 354-357.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook


Background: There is evidence that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is efficacious against depression in bipolar disorder but there are less data for mania. Similarly it has been suggested that rTMS may be effective against depressive symptoms in mixed states, with fewer evidence regarding manic symptoms. Deep TMS (dTMS) has been reported to be efficacious in bipolar depression, but there are no data concerning mixed states.

Procedure: We report the case of a bipolar II patient, in which dTMS displayed acute and maintenance efficacy against the depressive and hypomanic symptoms of a depressive episode with mixed features.

Conclusion: Randomized-controlled studies should be conducted to assess the acute and maintenance efficacy of dTMS in depression with mixed features.


Depression; Mixed features; Bipolar disorder; Deep TMS

Depression articles; Mixed features articles; Bipolar disorder articles; Deep TMS articles

Depression articles Depression Research articles Depression review articles Depression PubMed articles Depression PubMed Central articles Depression 2023 articles Depression 2024 articles Depression Scopus articles Depression impact factor journals Depression Scopus journals Depression PubMed journals Depression medical journals Depression free journals Depression best journals Depression top journals Depression free medical journals Depression famous journals Depression Google Scholar indexed journals Mixed features articles Mixed features Research articles Mixed features review articles Mixed features PubMed articles Mixed features PubMed Central articles Mixed features 2023 articles Mixed features 2024 articles Mixed features Scopus articles Mixed features impact factor journals Mixed features Scopus journals Mixed features PubMed journals Mixed features medical journals Mixed features free journals Mixed features best journals Mixed features top journals Mixed features free medical journals Mixed features famous journals Mixed features Google Scholar indexed journals Bipolar disorder articles Bipolar disorder Research articles Bipolar disorder review articles Bipolar disorder PubMed articles Bipolar disorder PubMed Central articles Bipolar disorder 2023 articles Bipolar disorder 2024 articles Bipolar disorder Scopus articles Bipolar disorder impact factor journals Bipolar disorder Scopus journals Bipolar disorder PubMed journals Bipolar disorder medical journals Bipolar disorder free journals Bipolar disorder best journals Bipolar disorder top journals Bipolar disorder free medical journals Bipolar disorder famous journals Bipolar disorder Google Scholar indexed journals Deep TMS articles Deep TMS Research articles Deep TMS review articles Deep TMS PubMed articles Deep TMS PubMed Central articles Deep TMS 2023 articles Deep TMS 2024 articles Deep TMS Scopus articles Deep TMS impact factor journals Deep TMS Scopus journals Deep TMS PubMed journals Deep TMS medical journals Deep TMS free journals Deep TMS best journals Deep TMS top journals Deep TMS free medical journals Deep TMS famous journals Deep TMS Google Scholar indexed journals transcranial magnetic stimulation  articles transcranial magnetic stimulation  Research articles transcranial magnetic stimulation  review articles transcranial magnetic stimulation  PubMed articles transcranial magnetic stimulation  PubMed Central articles transcranial magnetic stimulation  2023 articles transcranial magnetic stimulation  2024 articles transcranial magnetic stimulation  Scopus articles transcranial magnetic stimulation  impact factor journals transcranial magnetic stimulation  Scopus journals transcranial magnetic stimulation  PubMed journals transcranial magnetic stimulation  medical journals transcranial magnetic stimulation  free journals transcranial magnetic stimulation  best journals transcranial magnetic stimulation  top journals transcranial magnetic stimulation  free medical journals transcranial magnetic stimulation  famous journals transcranial magnetic stimulation  Google Scholar indexed journals  repetitive TMS articles  repetitive TMS Research articles  repetitive TMS review articles  repetitive TMS PubMed articles  repetitive TMS PubMed Central articles  repetitive TMS 2023 articles  repetitive TMS 2024 articles  repetitive TMS Scopus articles  repetitive TMS impact factor journals  repetitive TMS Scopus journals  repetitive TMS PubMed journals  repetitive TMS medical journals  repetitive TMS free journals  repetitive TMS best journals  repetitive TMS top journals  repetitive TMS free medical journals  repetitive TMS famous journals  repetitive TMS Google Scholar indexed journals pharmacotherapy articles pharmacotherapy Research articles pharmacotherapy review articles pharmacotherapy PubMed articles pharmacotherapy PubMed Central articles pharmacotherapy 2023 articles pharmacotherapy 2024 articles pharmacotherapy Scopus articles pharmacotherapy impact factor journals pharmacotherapy Scopus journals pharmacotherapy PubMed journals pharmacotherapy medical journals pharmacotherapy free journals pharmacotherapy best journals pharmacotherapy top journals pharmacotherapy free medical journals pharmacotherapy famous journals pharmacotherapy Google Scholar indexed journals Young Mania Rating Scale articles Young Mania Rating Scale Research articles Young Mania Rating Scale review articles Young Mania Rating Scale PubMed articles Young Mania Rating Scale PubMed Central articles Young Mania Rating Scale 2023 articles Young Mania Rating Scale 2024 articles Young Mania Rating Scale Scopus articles Young Mania Rating Scale impact factor journals Young Mania Rating Scale Scopus journals Young Mania Rating Scale PubMed journals Young Mania Rating Scale medical journals Young Mania Rating Scale free journals Young Mania Rating Scale best journals Young Mania Rating Scale top journals Young Mania Rating Scale free medical journals Young Mania Rating Scale famous journals Young Mania Rating Scale Google Scholar indexed journals unstable articles unstable Research articles unstable review articles unstable PubMed articles unstable PubMed Central articles unstable 2023 articles unstable 2024 articles unstable Scopus articles unstable impact factor journals unstable Scopus journals unstable PubMed journals unstable medical journals unstable free journals unstable best journals unstable top journals unstable free medical journals unstable famous journals unstable Google Scholar indexed journals randomized controlled trials articles randomized controlled trials Research articles randomized controlled trials review articles randomized controlled trials PubMed articles randomized controlled trials PubMed Central articles randomized controlled trials 2023 articles randomized controlled trials 2024 articles randomized controlled trials Scopus articles randomized controlled trials impact factor journals randomized controlled trials Scopus journals randomized controlled trials PubMed journals randomized controlled trials medical journals randomized controlled trials free journals randomized controlled trials best journals randomized controlled trials top journals randomized controlled trials free medical journals randomized controlled trials famous journals randomized controlled trials Google Scholar indexed journals

Article Details

1. Introduction

Clinical trials of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) indicate the potential of repetitive TMS (rTMS) for reducing depressive symptoms in bipolar disorder, while results are more controversial for mania [1]. Only one small open study has examined the efficacy of rTMS as maintenance treatment for bipolar disorder [2]. These studies have suggested that rTMS may be effective against depressive symptoms in mixed patients without inducing any manic/hypomanic switch [3-5], while another has reported efficacy in the treatment of both depressive and manic symptoms in mixed states [6]. Deep (H1 coil) TMS (dTMS) generates electrical fields that have greater penetration depth compared to standard rTMS [7]. It was shown to be an effective and well- tolerated add-on therapy in resistant bipolar depressed patients receiving adequate pharmacotherapy [8]. In addition, maintenance dTMS sessions were found to be helpful in maintaining euthymia in a 12 month follow-up period, after recovery from acute depressive episode [9].

We report in this study the case of a bipolar II patient who was successfully treated with dTMS, administered both as acute and maintenance treatment for depression with mixed features.

2. Case Report

This 43 -year- old male bipolar II patient was hospitalized in our clinic in March 2018 for a depressive episode with mixed features according to DSM5 criteria. The following symptoms were part of the depressive picture: loss of interest, hopelessness, hypersomnia, fatigue and feelings of worthlessness. Associated hypomanic features were racing thoughts, talkativeness and grandiosity. Symptoms such as irritability, impulsivity, affective lability or risky behaviours were not present. The patient experienced his first depressive episode in April 2008 and his first hypomanic episode in December 2008. During ten years, he had experienced a mean of 2.2 ± 1.3 episodes per year. Since April 2008, he was treated with lamotrigine (400 mg/d). Adherence to treatment was fair. His depressive relapses were usually successfully treated with the addition of quetiapine (300 mg/d) to his regimen. The same held true for his hypomanic episodes (quetiapine 400 mg/d). For the first time in March 2018, he experienced depression with mixed features and the combination of lamotrigine with quetiapine appeared to be no more successful, whatever the doses used. This condition even worsened when paroxetine (20 mg/d) was associated with lamotrigine and quetiapine. Because of the expertise in our clinic to treat refractory depressed patients with dTMS, we decided to administer this kind of therapy 1 week after having stopped quetiapine and paroxetine. The patient was maintained on lamotrigine (400 mg/d). The coil was positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which was found 6 cm anteriority to the ‘hot spot’ (ie, the optimal location on the scalp to evoke a maximum TMS response with minimum stimulator intensity), per a ruler attached to the subject’s cap. The motor threshold MT (the lowest stimulation intensity necessary to evoke a motor potential with at least 50μV amplitude in 50 % of attempts) was assessed before treatment and then every week. The simulation consisted of 55 18 Hz, 2 s trains at 120 % MT intensity, with a between-train interval of 20s. The patient was stimulated every day for 4 weeks (except weekends), three days per week for the following 3 months, and then one day per week. Today he is still stimulated once a week, and this since August 2018.

Before beginning the treatment with dTMS, the patient had a 17- item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score of 25, and a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score of 11. After 1 month of treatment the HDRS score dropped to 6, the YMRS score to 1, and criteria for depression with mixed features were no more fulfilled. Since that time, the patient had never experienced any relapse. His HDRS score has remained between 0 and 6, and his YMRS score between 0 and 2. The only medication received since April 2018 and maintained during all that time was lamotrigine (400 mg/d). No adverse effects were observed during both the acute and maintenance treatment.

3. Discussion

This case may be remarkable for three reasons. First, it is the first case of depression with mixed features fulfilling DSM5 criteria, to have been successfully treated with TMS. Second, it is the first report on the efficacy of dTMS in mixed episodes. Third, it is the first study to suggest maintenance efficacy of TMS in bipolar disorder over a period of two years.

The beneficial effects observed in this report could be explained by the deeper stimulation exerted by dTMS on dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal areas which also project into other brain areas that present impaired functioning in bipolar disorder [8].

This study is based on a single case and it is therefore difficult to draw any firm conclusion or to generalize to different situations. The patient had a bipolar II disorder, no comorbid condition (either psychiatric or organic) and a ‘stable’ mixed depressive episode occurring on the basis of a hyperthymic temperament [10]. Mixed depressive patients with other types of bipolar disorder or with unipolar disorder, patients with comorbid conditions or patients with ‘unstable’ mixed depression, may have exhibited different responses to dTMS.

4. Conclusion

Nonetheless, this case report suggests that it may be worth evaluating in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), TMS as an intervention for mixed depression, either as acute or maintenance treatment. RCTs of dTMS for maintenance treatment of affective disorders are still lacking.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


  1. Gold AK, Ornelas AC, Cirillo P et al. Clinical applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation in bipolar disorder. Brain and Behavior 9 (2019): e01419.
  2. Li X, Nahas Z, Anderson B, et al. Can left prefrontal rTMS be used as a maintenance treatment for bipolar depression? Depress Anxiety 20 (2004): 98-100.
  3. Zeeuws D, Santermans L, Baeken C, et al. Intensive rTMS applications in difficult to treat psychiatric patients : some cases. Psychiatria Danubina 22 (2010 a): 135-136.
  4. Zeeuws D, Santermans L, Baeken C, et al. Combative HF-r TMS treatment, for a bipolar I patient, following unsuccessful ECT. Psychiatria Danubina 22 (2010 b): 164.
  5. Zeeuws D, De Rycker K, De Raedt R, et al. Intensive high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in an electroconvulsive shock therapy-resistant bipolar I patient with mixed episode. Brain Stimulation 4 (2011): 46-49.
  6. Pallanti S, Grassi G, Antonini S, et al. rTMS in resistant mixed states: An exploratory study. J Affect Disord 157 (2014): 66-71.
  7. Roth Y, Amir A, Levkovitz Z, et al. Three-dimensional distribution of the electric field induced in the brain bytranscranial magnetic stimulationusing figure-8 and deep H-coils. J Clin Neurophysiol 24 (2007): 31-38.
  8. Tavares DF, Myczkowski ML, Alberto RL, et al. Treatment of bipolar depression with deep TMS: results from a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, sham-controlled clinical trial. Neuropsychopharmacol 42 (2017): 2593-2601.
  9. Rapinesi C, Saverio Bersani F, Kotzalidis GD, et al. Maintenance deep transcranial magnetic stimulation sessions are associated with reduced depressive relapses in patients with unipolar or bipolar depression. Front Neurol 6 (2015): 16.
  10. Azorin JM, Kaladjian A, Adida M, et al. Self-assessment and characteristics of mixed depression in the French national EPIDEP study. J Affect Disord 143 (2012): 109-117.

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved