A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Bivalent Covid-19 Vaccines
Article Information
Dan-Yu Lin1*, Yangjianchen Xu1, Donglin Zeng2, Shadia Khan Sunny3
1The University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
2The University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
3North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, NC, USA
*Corresponding author: Dan-Yu Lin, Department of Biostatistics, The University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7420, USA.
Received: 13 October 2023; Accepted: 20 October 2023; Published: 01 November 2023
Citation: Dan-Yu Lin, Yangjianchen Xu, Donglin Zeng, Shadia Khan Sunny. A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Bivalent Covid-19 Vaccines. Journal of Biotechnology and Biomedicine. 6 (2023): 551-553.
View / Download Pdf Share at FacebookAbstract
The cost-benefit ratios of the bivalent vaccines were unknown. To address this issue, we considered surveillance data on the administration of the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent vaccines and clinical outcomes from September 1, 2022 to February 10, 2023 for North Carolina residents 12 years of age or older. We found that booster vaccination was much more beneficial for people 65 years of age or older than for people 12–64 years of age, mainly because the risks of hospitalization and death were much higher in the older age group.
Keywords
Covid-19-related death; Hospitalization; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccination; Vaccine boosters; Vaccine effectiveness
Covid-19-related death articles Covid-19-related death Research articles Covid-19-related death review articles Covid-19-related death PubMed articles Covid-19-related death PubMed Central articles Covid-19-related death 2023 articles Covid-19-related death 2024 articles Covid-19-related death Scopus articles Covid-19-related death impact factor journals Covid-19-related death Scopus journals Covid-19-related death PubMed journals Covid-19-related death medical journals Covid-19-related death free journals Covid-19-related death best journals Covid-19-related death top journals Covid-19-related death free medical journals Covid-19-related death famous journals Covid-19-related death Google Scholar indexed journals Hospitalization articles Hospitalization Research articles Hospitalization review articles Hospitalization PubMed articles Hospitalization PubMed Central articles Hospitalization 2023 articles Hospitalization 2024 articles Hospitalization Scopus articles Hospitalization impact factor journals Hospitalization Scopus journals Hospitalization PubMed journals Hospitalization medical journals Hospitalization free journals Hospitalization best journals Hospitalization top journals Hospitalization free medical journals Hospitalization famous journals Hospitalization Google Scholar indexed journals SARS-CoV-2 articles SARS-CoV-2 Research articles SARS-CoV-2 review articles SARS-CoV-2 PubMed articles SARS-CoV-2 PubMed Central articles SARS-CoV-2 2023 articles SARS-CoV-2 2024 articles SARS-CoV-2 Scopus articles SARS-CoV-2 impact factor journals SARS-CoV-2 Scopus journals SARS-CoV-2 PubMed journals SARS-CoV-2 medical journals SARS-CoV-2 free journals SARS-CoV-2 best journals SARS-CoV-2 top journals SARS-CoV-2 free medical journals SARS-CoV-2 famous journals SARS-CoV-2 Google Scholar indexed journals Vaccination articles Vaccination Research articles Vaccination review articles Vaccination PubMed articles Vaccination PubMed Central articles Vaccination 2023 articles Vaccination 2024 articles Vaccination Scopus articles Vaccination impact factor journals Vaccination Scopus journals Vaccination PubMed journals Vaccination medical journals Vaccination free journals Vaccination best journals Vaccination top journals Vaccination free medical journals Vaccination famous journals Vaccination Google Scholar indexed journals Vaccine boosters articles Vaccine boosters Research articles Vaccine boosters review articles Vaccine boosters PubMed articles Vaccine boosters PubMed Central articles Vaccine boosters 2023 articles Vaccine boosters 2024 articles Vaccine boosters Scopus articles Vaccine boosters impact factor journals Vaccine boosters Scopus journals Vaccine boosters PubMed journals Vaccine boosters medical journals Vaccine boosters free journals Vaccine boosters best journals Vaccine boosters top journals Vaccine boosters free medical journals Vaccine boosters famous journals Vaccine boosters Google Scholar indexed journals Vaccine effectiveness articles Vaccine effectiveness Research articles Vaccine effectiveness review articles Vaccine effectiveness PubMed articles Vaccine effectiveness PubMed Central articles Vaccine effectiveness 2023 articles Vaccine effectiveness 2024 articles Vaccine effectiveness Scopus articles Vaccine effectiveness impact factor journals Vaccine effectiveness Scopus journals Vaccine effectiveness PubMed journals Vaccine effectiveness medical journals Vaccine effectiveness free journals Vaccine effectiveness best journals Vaccine effectiveness top journals Vaccine effectiveness free medical journals Vaccine effectiveness famous journals Vaccine effectiveness Google Scholar indexed journals infections articles infections Research articles infections review articles infections PubMed articles infections PubMed Central articles infections 2023 articles infections 2024 articles infections Scopus articles infections impact factor journals infections Scopus journals infections PubMed journals infections medical journals infections free journals infections best journals infections top journals infections free medical journals infections famous journals infections Google Scholar indexed journals surveillance articles surveillance Research articles surveillance review articles surveillance PubMed articles surveillance PubMed Central articles surveillance 2023 articles surveillance 2024 articles surveillance Scopus articles surveillance impact factor journals surveillance Scopus journals surveillance PubMed journals surveillance medical journals surveillance free journals surveillance best journals surveillance top journals surveillance free medical journals surveillance famous journals surveillance Google Scholar indexed journals outcomes articles outcomes Research articles outcomes review articles outcomes PubMed articles outcomes PubMed Central articles outcomes 2023 articles outcomes 2024 articles outcomes Scopus articles outcomes impact factor journals outcomes Scopus journals outcomes PubMed journals outcomes medical journals outcomes free journals outcomes best journals outcomes top journals outcomes free medical journals outcomes famous journals outcomes Google Scholar indexed journals clinical articles clinical Research articles clinical review articles clinical PubMed articles clinical PubMed Central articles clinical 2023 articles clinical 2024 articles clinical Scopus articles clinical impact factor journals clinical Scopus journals clinical PubMed journals clinical medical journals clinical free journals clinical best journals clinical top journals clinical free medical journals clinical famous journals clinical Google Scholar indexed journals
Article Details
Introduction
Covid-19 vaccination was effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes; however, vaccine effectiveness waned over time, and repeated booster vaccination was required to enhance immunity [1-3]. The United States government alone has spent more than $30 billion on Covid-19 vaccines, and the prices of the updated bivalent vaccines are expected to rise sharply after the end of the federal COVID-19 Public Health Emergency declaration [4]. A question naturally arises: what are the cost-benefit ratios of the bivalent vaccines?
Methods
To answer this question, we considered surveillance data on the administration of the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent vaccines and clinical outcomes from September 1, 2022 to February 10, 2023 for North Carolina residents 12 years of age or older [3]. Of the 6,306,311 participants who had been previously vaccinated or boosted, 1,279,802 received the bivalent vaccines as a booster dose. A total of 154,581 SARS-CoV-2 infections, 2,208 Covid-19-related hospitalizations, and 867 Covid-19-related deaths were reported over this 23-week period [3].
We estimated the effectiveness (one minus relative risk) of one booster dose under a proportional hazards model for hospitalization (or death) and a proportional rates model for recurrent infection, while adjusting for baseline characteristics [3]. Using the fitted models, we predicted the cumulative frequency of infection and the cumulative incidences of hospitalization and death when none of the participants received a bivalent booster versus when every participant received a bivalent booster on September 1, 2022. We then calculated the differences between the two sets of predicted values and multiplied them by 1 million to estimate the numbers of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths that would be prevented by administering 1 million doses of bivalent vaccines, which would cost $120 million at the price of $120 per dose. We obtained the confidence intervals by the bootstrap method.
Results
The results are shown in column A of Table 1. For individuals 65 years of age or older, 1 million doses would prevent 3,010 (95% CI, 2,737 to 3,283) infections, 489 (95% CI, 362 to 616) hospitalizations, and 179 (95% CI, 117 to 242) deaths. For individuals 12–64 years of age, 1 million doses would prevent 2,379 (95% CI, 2,168 to 2,590) infections, 55 (95% CI, 41 to 68) hospitalizations, and 10 (95% CI, 6 to 14) deaths. The number of infections prevented would be much higher than the numbers of hospitalization and death prevented, and the numbers of hospitalizations and deaths prevented would be much higher in the older age group than in the younger age group. The impact of bivalent boosters on the study cohort is shown in Table 2.
The number of prevented events depends on the duration of follow-up. The above results pertain to a duration of 23 weeks after booster administration. Because of the rapid waning of booster effectiveness against infection [3], no additional infections would be prevented after 23 weeks. Booster effectiveness against hospitalization and death also waned over time but was 34% and 38%, respectively, at 23 weeks [3], such that the numbers of hospitalizations and deaths to be eventually prevented would be greater than what are shown in column A of Table 1.
The surveillance system did not fully capture clinical outcomes, especially infections and hospitalizations, such that the actual numbers of infections and hospitalizations prevented would be greater than what are shown in column A of Table 1. More importantly, the transmissibility and lethality of the virus vary over time. Thus, we performed sensitivity analyses by assuming that the background risks of infection, hospitalization, and death are two times or half of the levels observed in our study while booster effectiveness remains the same. The results are shown in the last two columns of Table 1. Unsurprisingly, the number of prevented events increases (or decreases) as the disease incidence rises (or drops).
|
Age Group |
Covid-19 Outcome |
Scenarios A |
Scenarios B |
Scenarios C |
|
Observed Levels |
2 × Observed Levels |
½ Observed Levels |
||
|
≥12 Yr |
Infection |
|||
|
Background cumulative frequency frequency |
0.025 |
0.050 |
0.013 |
|
|
Number of events prevented (95% CI) |
2,556 (2,328 to 2,784) |
5,111 (4,655 to 5,568) |
1,278 (1,164 to 1,392) |
|
|
Hospitalization |
||||
|
Background cumulative incidence |
4.41×10-4 |
8.82×10-4 |
2.21×10-4 |
|
|
Number of events prevented (95% CI) |
183 (136 to 229) |
365 (272 to 459) |
91 (68 to 115) |
|
|
Death |
||||
|
Background cumulative incidence |
1.22×10-4 |
2.43×10-4 |
6.08×10-5 |
|
|
Number of events prevented (95% CI) |
59 (38 to 79) |
117 (76 to 158) |
29 (19 to 39) |
|
|
≥65 Yr |
Infection |
|||
|
Background cumulative frequency |
0.030 |
0.059 |
0.015 |
|
|
Number of events prevented (95% CI) |
3,010 (2,737 to 3,283) |
6,020 (5,474 to 6,567) |
1,505 (1,368 to 1,642) |
|
|
Hospitalization |
||||
|
Background cumulative incidence |
1.18×10-3 |
2.36×10-3 |
5.90×10-4 |
|
|
Number of events prevented (95% CI) |
489 (362 to 616) |
977 (723 to 1,230) |
244 (181 to 308) |
|
|
Death |
||||
|
Background cumulative incidence |
3.73×10-4 |
7.46×10-4 |
1.86×10-4 |
|
|
Number of events prevented (95% CI) |
179 (117 to 242) |
358 (234 to 483) |
90 (58 to 121) |
|
|
12–64 Yr |
Infection |
|||
|
Background cumulative frequency |
0.023 |
0.047 |
0.012 |
|
|
Number of events prevented (95% CI) |
2,379 (2,168 to 2,590) |
4,758 (4,336 to 5,180) |
1,190 (1,084 to 1,295) |
|
|
Hospitalization |
||||
|
Background cumulative incidence |
1.32×10-4 |
2.64×10-4 |
6.59×10-5 |
|
|
Number of events prevented (95% CI) |
55 (41 to 68) |
109 (82 to 137) |
27 (20 to 34) |
|
|
Death |
||||
|
Background cumulative incidence |
2.04×10-5 |
4.08×10-5 |
1.02×10-5 |
|
|
Number of events prevented (95% CI) |
10 (6 to 14) |
20 (11 to 28) |
5 (3 to 7) |
Table 1: Number of Covid-19 Events Prevented by One Million Doses of Bivalent Vaccines.
|
Age Group |
Covid-19 Outcomes |
Non-Booster Participants |
Booster Recipients |
|
≥12 Yr |
N=5,026,509 |
N=1,279,802 |
|
|
Infection |
14,134 (13,062 to 15,205) |
5,833 (5,612 to 6,054) |
|
|
Hospitalization |
675 (517 to 832) |
320 (281 to 358) |
|
|
Death |
255 (184 to 325) |
161 (141 to 181) |
|
|
≥65 Yr |
N=1,172,870 |
N=592,075 |
|
|
Infection |
4,323 (3,985 to 4,660) |
3,059 (2,897 to 3,222) |
|
|
Hospitalization |
538 (421 to 654) |
297 (260 to 334) |
|
|
Death |
229 (169 to 288) |
151 (132 to 171) |
|
|
12–64 Yr |
N=3,853,639 |
N=687,727 |
|
|
Infection |
9,811 (8,966 to 10,657) |
2,774 (2,655 to 2,892) |
|
|
Hospitalization |
137 (91 to 184) |
23 (16 to 29) |
|
|
Death |
26 (13 to 39) |
10 (7 to 13) |
Table 2: Numbers of events that would have been prevented (95% CI) if all non-booster participants had received boosters on September 1, 2022 and additional numbers of events that would have occurred (95% CI) if booster recipients had not received boosters during the period of September 1, 2022—February 19, 2023 among North Carolina residents 12 years of age or older who were eligible to receive bivalent boosters.
Discussion
Booster vaccination was much more beneficial for people 65 years of age or older than for people 12–64 years of age, mainly because the risks of hospitalization and death were much higher in the older age group. The cost-benefit ratio of a vaccination program will depend on vaccine effectiveness, the background risks of infection and severe outcomes, the prices of the vaccines, as well as the costs associated with hospitalization and years of life lost.
References
- Lin DY, Gu Y, Wheeler B, et al. Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines over a 9-month period in North Carolina. N Engl J Med 386 (2022): 933-941.
- Lin DY, Gu Y, Xu Y, et al. Association of primary and booster vaccination and prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes. JAMA 328 (2022): 1415-1426.
- Lin DY, Xu Y, Gu Y, et al. Durability of bivalent boosters against omicron subvariants. N Engl J Med 388 (2023): 1818-1820.
- Kates J, Cox C, Michaud J. How much could Covid-19 vaccines cost the U.S. after commercialization?